Re: mpd 3.18 and FreeBSD 6.0

2006-01-20 Thread Archie Cobbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: link is preferred to disable windowing on the client side, or the server side? If possible, I would prefer to disable it on the client side since I have several Windows users who also connect to this server. They are independent. Not sure if or how you can disable it o

Re: IPSEC documentation

2006-01-20 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:53:33PM +, Brian Candler wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:50:47AM +0300, Alexey Popov wrote: > > > If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice > > > of VPN concentrator. > > I just saw this patch posted on the ipsec-tools-devel list: >

Re: IPSEC documentation

2006-01-20 Thread Brian Candler
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:50:47AM +0300, Alexey Popov wrote: > > If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice > > of VPN concentrator. I just saw this patch posted on the ipsec-tools-devel list: http://ipsec-tools.sf.net/freebsd6-natt.diff It's for FreeBSD 6 but also

Re: mpd 3.18 and FreeBSD 6.0

2006-01-20 Thread jhall
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 06:57:23PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > j> > I guess you are using PPTP, although this word is absent in your > mail. mpd > j> > can support different protocols, so reporting what you are actually > using > j> > is important. > j> > > j> > The PPTP protocol has a terr

Re: mpd 3.18 and FreeBSD 6.0

2006-01-20 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 06:57:23PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: j> > I guess you are using PPTP, although this word is absent in your mail. mpd j> > can support different protocols, so reporting what you are actually using j> > is important. j> > j> > The PPTP protocol has a terrible idea - wind

Re: mpd 3.18 and FreeBSD 6.0

2006-01-20 Thread jhall
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:52:40PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > j> Recently, I tried to upgrade my firewall from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0 and > from > j> mpd 3.17 to mpd 3.18. > j> > j> Initially, everything works. However, after a few hours (4 to 5) users > j> start complaining about slow connec

Re: mpd 3.18 and FreeBSD 6.0

2006-01-20 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:52:40PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: j> Recently, I tried to upgrade my firewall from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0 and from j> mpd 3.17 to mpd 3.18. j> j> Initially, everything works. However, after a few hours (4 to 5) users j> start complaining about slow connection speeds,

Re: MPD and client behind firewall

2006-01-20 Thread Angelo Turetta
Tiago Cruz wrote: Hi all! I have a FreeBSD 6.0 running MPD server 3.18_3. The MPD server works very good when I has _direct_ connected by Internet. My problem is with one _client_ (Win XP) behind NAT from iptables. I have to do some in my PF? I think you are seeing the same problem that I had

RFC 3042 support in FreeBSD 6

2006-01-20 Thread David Clerc
Hi, I have a remark about the RFC 3042 code that is implemented in tcp_input.c (CVS version 1.281.2.2). When a duplicate ack comes in, the code saves the congestion window (cwnd), changes it to allow one packet to be sent, and then calls tcp_output(). Is there a reason for not saving the bandwid

In case you haven't noticed this: John Nagle about fixing a problem in TCP

2006-01-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, I just found this in the comments on slashdot (http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=174457&cid=14515105) ---snip--- The trouble with the Nagle algorithm I really should fix the bad interaction between the "Nagle algorithm" and "delayed ACKs". Both ideas went into TCP around the sam

Re: nss_ldap and pam_ldap troubles

2006-01-20 Thread Andrew MacTaggart
Thanks Jorge for the debug read1msg: V2 referral chased, mark request completed, id = 1 new result: res_errno: 32, res_error: , res_matched: <> read1msg: 0 new referrals read1msg: mark request completed, id = 1 request 1 done res_errno: 32, res_error: , res_matched: <> ldap_free_request (origi