Re: Memory leak in net80211 on FBSD 6.0

Nate Nielsen wrote: Nate Nielsen wrote: I'm experiencing a memory leak in the net80211 code. I have two atheros 5213-A cards on two embedded systems running FreeBSD 6.0. They are setup as IBSS (adhoc) stations. After roughly 15 seconds of ~14Mbps TCP traffic (single stream) I promptly run out o

Re: Memory leak in net80211 on FBSD 6.0

Nate Nielsen wrote: > I'm experiencing a memory leak in the net80211 code. I have two atheros > 5213-A cards on two embedded systems running FreeBSD 6.0. They are setup > as IBSS (adhoc) stations. After roughly 15 seconds of ~14Mbps TCP > traffic (single stream) I promptly run out of memory: > >>l

Memory leak in net80211 on FBSD 6.0

I'm experiencing a memory leak in the net80211 code. I have two atheros 5213-A cards on two embedded systems running FreeBSD 6.0. They are setup as IBSS (adhoc) stations. After roughly 15 seconds of ~14Mbps TCP traffic (single stream) I promptly run out of memory: > login: panic: kmem_malloc(4096)

Re: Wireless

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:42:52PM -0600, Douglass, Erik wrote: > Broadcom 1370 on a Dell D610.. Anyone have any luck with this?? Not > seeing any wi* entries in ifconfig. Using FreeBSD 6.0 We have no native support for broadcom wireless devices (the wouldn't be wi(4) anyway since we aren't Lin

Wireless

Broadcom 1370 on a Dell D610.. Anyone have any luck with this?? Not seeing any wi* entries in ifconfig. Using FreeBSD 6.0 Thanks for any help!! Erik Douglass Network Coordinator Gaylord Texan Resort and Convention Center Grapevine, Texas 76051 817.778.3633 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: if_bridge not working with second interface

On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 06:03:35PM +0200, ?zkan KIRIK wrote: > Hi, > > i am trying to bridge two interfaces via if_bridge. > i built a new kernel that includes "device if_bridge" line. > > # ifconfig bridge0 addm fxp0 > > # ping 10.0.0.2 > PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from

Re: proposal: TCP rendevous

Am 27.11.2005 um 11:18 schrieb Paweł Małachowski: On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:18:49PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: I'm still thinking about connecting systems separated by NAT however. that's a trickier problem. you still need to use outgoing connections but no-one who is not in the path ca

Re: parallelizing ipfw table

Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 06:04:50PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: > M> I remember that we had an extensive discussion about this around > M> FreeBSD-SA-05:13.ipfw - the bottom line seems to be: either parallel or > M> cacheing. Stack storage should work as well. > > The cacheing i

Re: natd redirected ports from LAN

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:46:10PM +0200, asko wrote: > I'm searching for a better, faster solution.. > Does it exist? Do your constraints allow you switch to 'pf' instead of 'ipfw'? I think you may be able to do it that way. I had a similar situation where I wanted traffic originating from the l

natd redirected ports from LAN

Hi, As you know, natd redirected ports in router from WAN to LAN work only from outside. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-August/015552.html For example, www.example.com has public IP - a.b.c.d webserver is in LAN, 192.168.1.10 router is 192.168.1.1 #rc.conf natd_ena