On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Julian Elischer wrote:
In this world of P2P apps it would be neat to have a way that two P2P apps
could attach to each other even though each is through a firewall. Most
firewalls only allow
"outgoing" connections.
Go research Microsoft's uPnP firewall support.
Mike "S
In this world of P2P apps it would be neat to have a way that two P2P apps
could attach to each other even though each is through a firewall. Most
firewalls only allow
"outgoing" connections.
It would of course be possible via a 3rd party relaying but that is
inneffieient and the throughput
w
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 03:59:43AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> Colleagues,
T>
T> in ipfw(4) we've got a reader/writer locking semantics. The ipfw
T> lookups performed on packet forwarding obtain reader lock on ipfw
T> chain, while altering the chain requires writer access on chain.
T>
T> S
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:20:01PM -0200, Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
> But i use route add 200.144.xx.xx/[mask] 172.22.xx.xx for
> many year, and this work perfectly on freebsd and linux.
Yes it does (as of a couple of years ago, I think).
However if you want to specify the netmask ex
In FreeBSD 6.0-RC1, with a gigabit link, the re driver got continuous
watchdog timeouts and could not be used, although somehow the arp table
got populated anyway.
In FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE, the re driver seems to work with ACPI disabled,
but with ACPI enabled, it still gets watchdog timeouts (and al
On 26 Nov 2005, at 3:53 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
the ARP problem in RELENG_6 is fixed in revision 1.137.2.6 of
if_ether.c.
The problem was introduced in revision 1.137.2.5. Make sure that
you have
revision 1.137.2.4 or revision 1.137.2.6.
It was kind of a sticky situation: I could not s
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 17:31 +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:00:14PM +0200, Iasen Kostov wrote:
> I>When will if_em support 82572EI (and 82572 in general).
> I> I saw this
> I> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/cvs/2005-10/0235.html
> I>
> I> from which is
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:00:14PM +0200, Iasen Kostov wrote:
I> When will if_em support 82572EI (and 82572 in general).
I> I saw this
I> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/cvs/2005-10/0235.html
I>
I> from which is this quote:
I> "Sync up to Intel's latest FreeBSD em driver which
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:45:11AM +0200, Lasse Saranto wrote:
L> I have the exactly same script (although I've got Realteks) as the original
L> poster. If you run dhclient ngeth0 and use tcpdump on ngeth0, you see the
L> dhcp discover packets going out, but no replys. But when you use tcpdump on
L
Colleagues,
the ARP problem in RELENG_6 is fixed in revision 1.137.2.6 of if_ether.c.
The problem was introduced in revision 1.137.2.5. Make sure that you have
revision 1.137.2.4 or revision 1.137.2.6.
I'm sorry for the problems that I've caused to you.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-R
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:43:17PM +0100, Ferdinand Goldmann wrote:
F> I have a 3com 3c996-SX card running under FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE.
F> Performance is quite ok so far, but interrupt load is very high.
F> (Machine is working as a traffic shaping device/firewall)
F>
F> # vmstat -i
F> interrupt
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:12:04PM +, Volcane wrote:
V> I scanned through the archive and noticed a posting there about an
V> interrupt storm on the em driver, I am not sure if my symptoms are
V> related so I decided on a new thread.
V>
V> I first installed the 6.0-RELEASE using FTP install an
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:08:08PM +0700, Hendry Sarumpaet wrote:
H> >> The following change appears to have crashed my network today.
H>
H> > Ditto, this killed both my wireless and wired interfaces upon a cvsup to
H> > the latest RELENG_6. It just sent a continuous stream of ARP queries,
H> > m
13 matches
Mail list logo
