im trying to setup a wireless access point using 6.0-release. i can
associate with ath0, but packets sent out over the bridge arent
returned. any ideas on whats causing packets to go astray?
network:
{Internet}
|
-
| DSL
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:35:35PM +, Baldur Gislason wrote:
> I've also wanted to have multiple interfaces on the same physical network
> with
> different addresses on the same subnet.
That's a reasonable thing to want to do, and I remember seeing a statement
saying that FreeBSD plans to a
Hi, Robert,
> I've seen a number of reports that TCP inflight data limiting is
> substantially impacting performance on high bandwidth, low latency
> networks. Not knowing much about it, I figured I'd post on net@ and see
> if anyone here is interested in taking a look at some of the reports
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:27:48PM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:52:03PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> > Scenario#1:
> > -I have a range of ip's, for example 215.10.10.0 - 215.10.10.255.
> > -I want to distrubute theese ip's to my customers via DHCP.
> > -They are all ata
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:52:03PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> Scenario#1:
> -I have a range of ip's, for example 215.10.10.0 - 215.10.10.255.
> -I want to distrubute theese ip's to my customers via DHCP.
> -They are all atached to me via a VLAN-trunk on a unique VID
> -I have 200+ customers.
>
OK
Scenario#1:
-I have a range of ip's, for example 215.10.10.0 - 215.10.10.255.
-I want to distrubute theese ip's to my customers via DHCP.
-They are all atached to me via a VLAN-trunk on a unique VID
-I have 200+ customers.
If I was to subnet these addresses so that all the sustomers would get
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:06:03PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> Not a big fan of Linux though. I will have to wait for this to be ported
> to BSD. Anyone with info if this is being done?
...
> > [1] http://www.sjdjweis.com/linux/proxyarp/
You can do proxyarp like that with FreeBSD now. However yo
The linux-soloution you are describeing is exactly what I want to do.
Not a big fan of Linux though. I will have to wait for this to be ported
to BSD. Anyone with info if this is being done?
/Jon
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 14:57 +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi, Jon, Brian,
>
> > That depends...
>
Hi,
Has anyone successfully connected Watchguard SOHO 6tc to FreeBSD with
IPSEC. I am not able to get pass phase 1 during key exchange..
[snip]
$cat vpn1.sh
setkey -FP
setkey -F
#
# Configure the Policy
#
setkey -c << END
spdadd 192.168.8.185/32 192.168.3.0/24 any -P out ipsec
esp/tunnel/
Hi, Jon, Brian,
> That depends...
>
> In all this - our role is similar to an ISP, but we are buying access to
> our customers from an external part. Every customer is delivered on a
> separate vlan trunked.
>
> - Our DSL customers cannot be set on the same VLAN i a single DSLAM
> (don't ask me
I have a box that amongst other tasks serves as a printer server and a
wlan bridge. The wired and wireless interfaces are members of the
bridge, and are unconfigured (except for ssid etc. on the wireless
interface). The bridge itself has an IP address, is subject to packet
filtering etc.
There i
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Kazuaki-san,
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:22:39PM +0900, Kazuaki Oda wrote:
> K> I have set up 2 routers with FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE. They are using carp
> K> interfaces, so one is a master router and another is a backup.
> K> They seemed to work fine, but a few days later
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:21:17 +0200,
> asko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have tried also des encryption and sha1 authentication, agressive and
> main mode, and so on, no joy ;-( It probably needs some specific tweaks?
> FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE, racoon-20050510a, Watchguard SOHO 6 tc fir
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 14:39 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> The latest Intel version is 3.2.18 I have a copy of it I got directly.
> but we are under NDA etc. It has a regular BSD copyright header on it
> so it looks like it should be ok for them to commit it but
> they may not be ready yet. i
Hi,
Has anyone successfully connected Watchguard SOHO 6tc to FreeBSD with
IPSEC. I am not able to get pass phase 1 during key exchange..
racoon.log shows:
2005-11-17 13:00:37: INFO: main.c:174:main(): @(#)internal version
20001216 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005-11-17 13:00:37: INFO: main.c:175:main()
Kazuaki-san,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:22:39PM +0900, Kazuaki Oda wrote:
K> I have set up 2 routers with FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE. They are using carp
K> interfaces, so one is a master router and another is a backup.
K> They seemed to work fine, but a few days later I noticed that not only
K> maste
16 matches
Mail list logo
