we are using DLINK quad-port 1000Mbit adapters(DFE-580). Them look like
four `ste' interfaces to the system and look fine. Usenet and freebsd-*
users were also saying that DFE-570 is even better, because they use DEC
chips for networking which should be better. Never had a chance to test.
AFAIK DFE
Hello,
It seems that the crash occurs only when ipfw or pf is enabled.
As suggested, I will submit a pr soon.
Csaba
Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:55:14PM +0100, Csaba Urban wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying tho have if_bridge work with vlan members
2005/11/11, Karel Miklav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Brian Reichert wrote:
> > Use a hub?
>
> This is an external thing, right?
>
> > By a quad-port NIC?
>
> Yes, that's more like it. I was searching for a multiport
> NIC the other day and found nothin, but your backup made
> me luckier. Level One's FNC
Brian Reichert wrote:
Use a hub?
This is an external thing, right?
By a quad-port NIC?
Yes, that's more like it. I was searching for a multiport
NIC the other day and found nothin, but your backup made
me luckier. Level One's FNC-0600TXM is supposed to be some
kind of a switch on a PCI card
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:17:00PM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
> I've made a router/firewall/server for home network out of
> an old pc. It connects with PPPOE over a big ugly ADSL
> modem. I'd like do add some clients, but I don't have
> enough slots for NICs and I don't wanna have another weird
>
I've made a router/firewall/server for home network out of
an old pc. It connects with PPPOE over a big ugly ADSL
modem. I'd like do add some clients, but I don't have
enough slots for NICs and I don't wanna have another weird
external device. What are my options?
--
Thanks,
Karel Miklav
___
Hi,
When sending large udp packet (larger then mtu) to an ip that need arp
resolve, the first frag will be lost.
The ip_output() sends out the fragments in a loop. The first frag cause
an arp request and the mbuf will be hold in "struct llinfo_arp" for send
after arp can be resolved. However
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:08:34PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> The point in all this is to reduce administration on my hand and in some
> cases to offer a service to customers with the feeling that they reside
> "on the same layer".
That is, customer A *wants* to see all the Netbios broadcasts f
The point in all this is to reduce administration on my hand and in some
cases to offer a service to customers with the feeling that they reside
"on the same layer".
Today I'm routing the traffic.
Alcatels soloution to this is to put an ARP-proxy in a Cisco-router. I
cannot understand why Alcatel
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> In all this - our role is similar to an ISP, but we are buying access to
> our customers from an external part. Every customer is delivered on a
> separate vlan trunked.
>
> - Our DSL customers cannot be set on the same VLAN i a sin
That depends...
In all this - our role is similar to an ISP, but we are buying access to
our customers from an external part. Every customer is delivered on a
separate vlan trunked.
- Our DSL customers cannot be set on the same VLAN i a single DSLAM
(don't ask me why - ask Alcatel).
- We cannot
I've seen a number of reports that TCP inflight data limiting is
substantially impacting performance on high bandwidth, low latency
networks. Not knowing much about it, I figured I'd post on net@ and see
if anyone here is interested in taking a look at some of the reports
(they're easy to fi
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:06:28PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> I want to create a bridge-interface (if_bridge) with a bunch (500+) of
> sub-interfaces (vlan) as members. All members of the bridge should be
> able to "talk" to each other but MAC-addresses must be isolated to their
> "own" vlan.
T
13 matches
Mail list logo
