ipf ttl question

2005-10-11 Thread Dave+Seddon
Greetings, I'm running ipf+ipnat and proftp. I'm encountering a problem where the data connection is working fine, however because there's a large tranfer no data is tranferred on port 21, so the port 21 session dies (ttl expires). The transfer is running now. How can I change the ttl on t

Re: VIA VT6103 support (VIA EPIA PD)

2005-10-11 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:14:47 +0200 (CEST), in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >Mike Tancsa wrote: > > [ Oliver Fromme wrote: ] > > > It has survived several buildworlds and network activity > > > without any problems. It's now running today's 6.0-BETA5. > > > Here's a copy of dmesg, if someon

ipfw man page inconsistency

2005-10-11 Thread Julian Elischer
The man page says: (yes, at the moment there is no way to differentiate between ether_demux and bdg_forward). However in the "options" section there is a "bridged" keyword bridged Matches only bridged packets. so we should be able to differentiate between:

RE: GRE tunnels anyone?

2005-10-11 Thread Mire, John
In the past, with RELEASE-4.X we had multiple tunnels coming in to our 7206VXR, I can't put my hands on the the IOS config at the moment but here's the startup script used on the two remote boxes. #!/bin/sh if [ $# -eq 0 ]; then disable_config_ipsec="NO" else if [ "$#" -eq 1 ]; then c

Re: GRE tunnels anyone?

2005-10-11 Thread Danny Howard
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Joshua Weaver wrote: > The company I work for uses a lot of multicast tunnels, usually with a > QOS/GRE implementation with quite pricy hardware. I googled around a bit, > it looks like basic vpn is supported for FreeBSD. I guess my questions are > > 1.)

Re: Strange Network Performance

2005-10-11 Thread Chuck Swiger
Thomas M. Skeren III wrote: [ ...FTP transfer speeds very different... ] The data transfer rate is about 93.5% of these speeds for smb transfers. No other server exhibits this behavior. I'm really puzzeled. [ ... ] Any suggestions as to wtf is up would be appreciated. You should look at "ne

Strange Network Performance

2005-10-11 Thread Thomas M. Skeren III
I have 6 5.3 and 3 5.4 for servers. The servers provide Samba/LDAP, DHCP, Natting, IPSec (for vlan tunnels). One, and only one server behaves very oddly. If I do a transfer to the other BSD server there (LDAP Master and DNS), I get full wire speed: tp> 150 Opening BINARY mode data connecti

GRE tunnels anyone?

2005-10-11 Thread Joshua Weaver
The company I work for uses a lot of multicast tunnels, usually with a QOS/GRE implementation with quite pricy hardware. I googled around a bit, it looks like basic vpn is supported for FreeBSD. I guess my questions are 1.)Does FreeBSD play well with vpn-capable routers (like a 3Com 5012)

Re: Call for performance evaluation: net.isr.direct

2005-10-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Robert Watson wrote: In 2003, Jonathan Lemon added initial support for direct dispatch of netisr handlers from the calling thread, as part of his DARPA/NAI Labs contract in the DARPA CHATS research program. Over the last two years since then, Sam Leffler and I have worked

Re: VIA VT6103 support (VIA EPIA PD)

2005-10-11 Thread Oliver Fromme
Mike Tancsa wrote: > [ Oliver Fromme wrote: ] > > It has survived several buildworlds and network activity > > without any problems. It's now running today's 6.0-BETA5. > > Here's a copy of dmesg, if someone's interested: > > > > http://www.secnetix.de/~olli/dmesg/epia.6.0-BETA5.txt > >