I modify kernel codes to stat that.
And it's test in a real telecom environment.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave+Seddon
Sent: 2005年10月3日 6:15
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: problems with em(4)
Greetings,
> M> The problem i
I enable fast forwarding!
With or without ipfw, result is the same.
-Original Message-
From: Gleb Smirnoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2005年10月3日 3:18
To: Mao Shou Yan
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: problems with em(4)
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:48:59PM +0800, Mao Shou Yan
On 10/7/05, Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was reported by someone else to -stable, but seems more
> appropriate here. if_re.c breaks buildkernel on a RELENG_6 system that
> was just cvsup'ed. Was not broken yesterday.
[snip]
Ah, I see on -stable that the alpha tinderbox just ba
This was reported by someone else to -stable, but seems more
appropriate here. if_re.c breaks buildkernel on a RELENG_6 system that
was just cvsup'ed. Was not broken yesterday.
% grep FreeBSD /build/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c
__FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c,v 1.46.2.5 2005/10/07
14:00:04 gl
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antony Mawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm using one of the PD1 EPIA machines as a mail
> > server/router/firewall/etc at home and it performs quite nicely at the
> > job. I haven't noticed any problems with the network on it...:
>
> Cool
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:56:32PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> [broken quoting fixed]
>
> Donatas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Donatas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Just wonder - what is the major reason double vlan support
> > > > (also known as q-in-q or n
Iasen Kostov wrote:
IMHO proxy arp should only replay on specified interface not on every
arp capable interface which recieved request for the proxied address.
This is an interesting idea, but shouldn't it at least take into consideration
whether some interfaces are being bridged...?
IMHO proxy arp should only replay on specified interface not on every
arp capable interface which recieved request for the proxied address.
If lets say host A have arp capable if0 and if1 interfaces and U set:
route add -host 1.0.0.2 -iface if1 -proxy
and then a request is recieved
[broken quoting fixed]
Donatas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Donatas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just wonder - what is the major reason double vlan support
> > > (also known as q-in-q or nested vlan) is still not included
> > > in freebsd.
> >
> > It is suppor
netgraph sweet netgraph...
think you understand on my mind was a liitle bit different solution of the
problem :]
ifconfig vlan 10 create && ifconfig vlan10 vlan 10 vlandev fxp0
ifconfig vlan 111 create && ifconfig vlan111 vlan 111vlandev vlan10
> Donatas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just wo
Hello.
I saw John Baldwin commit to if_lge.c rev 1.43 and perform same changes for
if_nge.c
I've tested it and it works.
Patch in attachment or available from
http://www.netams.com/if_nge.c.patch
Also i've noticed if_lge affected same problem i've met nge.
In if_lgereg.h we have
struct lge_l
Donatas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wonder - what is the major reason double vlan support (also known as
> q-in-q
> or nested vlan) is still not included in freebsd.
It is supported, for years already (even in FreeBSD 4.x).
See ng_vlan(4). You can even do q-in-q-in-q if you want
(do C
12 matches
Mail list logo
