ifconfig xl1 xxx.xxx.xxx.63/27
sysctl net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1
And use xxx.xxx.xxx.32/27 in internal net for the customers
with default gateway xxx.xxx.xxx.63.
Swap masks if you want more then /27 for customers:
nic 1: xl0, xxx.xxx.xxx.2/30
nic 2: xl1, xxx.xxx.xxx.63/27
and net.link.ethe
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 22:56 +0100, Peter Wood wrote:
> Sods law, after working on this for two weeks I ask for help, then 20
> minutes later I figure it out. The easiest solution was to disable BPDU
> on the machines port on the Cisco.
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
> switchport mode trunk
>
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi everyone. I'm trying to do some strange things to the routing table, and
> I can't get them to work.
> Our ISP assigned us a /26 subnet. xxx.xxx.xx.1 is the main router, a Cisco
> 2511. xx.xx.xx.2 is the main server, and there are a few machi
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 21:43, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> > I am wondering what the "right" solution is here - I guess I could assign
> > an IP to the tunnel but it seems like a bit of a waste..
>
> You could assign the same IP address as dc1 to your gif0 interface but
> with a /32 netmask.
Hmm,
Or just
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
spanning-tree portfast
Or disable spanning tree
no spanning-tree vlan 1-100
You could also do some MAC address filtering as the BPDUs are ethernet
multicast, but that smacks of hard work. :)
Peter Wood writes:
Sods law, after working on this f
Greetings,
You need a seperate routing table. Try using Xen
(http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/), or there's a patch
floating around for FreeBSD4.9.
Dave
Barney Wolff writes:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:36:04AM -
Hi everyone. I'm trying to do some strange things to the routing table, and
I can't get them to work.
Our ISP assigned us a /26 subnet. xxx.xxx.xx.1 is the main router, a Cisco
2511. xx.xx.xx.2 is the main server, and there are a few machines. This
server, a FreeBSD is an access server, which al
Sods law, after working on this for two weeks I ask for help, then 20
minutes later I figure it out. The easiest solution was to disable BPDU
on the machines port on the Cisco.
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
Thought I'd post it for referenc
Evening,
I'm having an issue with using vlans and bridging. The issue is probably
something that can be fixed in either FreeBSD or in the Cisco IOS.
I'll explain what I have. I've got a external router that's sitting on
vlan 20, also on 20 is a FreeBSD gateway which I intend to use as a
fire
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:36:04AM -0400, Ames, Jonathan (N-ENSCO) wrote:
> > Can someone give me a hand with this?
>
> Here goes...
>
> > A PC has two ethernet ports, both directly on the motherboard.
> > Can I connect them externally
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:36:04AM -0400, Ames, Jonathan (N-ENSCO) wrote:
> Can someone give me a hand with this?
Here goes...
> A PC has two ethernet ports, both directly on the motherboard.
> Can I connect them externally with an ethernet cable and ping from
> one port to the other to test them
Hi,
Can someone give me a hand with this?
A PC has two ethernet ports, both directly on the motherboard. Can I connect
them externally with an ethernet cable and ping from one port to the other to
test them both? How?
Another PC has the two ports listed above, plus an additional ethernet por
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Igor Sysoev wrote:
I found strange timeout errors returned by kevent() in 6.0 using
my http server named nginx. The nginx's run on three machines:
two 4.10-RELEASE and one 6.0-BETA3. All machines serve the same
content (simple cluster) and each handles about 200 requests/se
Hi Chris and thanks for your reply.
I'm saying that cause some ISPs lock their "IP-offering"
with each client's hardware address (which is defined at first use).
Turns out this was right. The problem was that I didn't properly "release"
the session.
As far as the ``spoofing'' in the previous
Hi Chris,
Linux and freebsd you re trying, running on same hardware (nic) ?
I'm saying that cause some ISPs lock their "IP-offering"
with each client's hardware address (which is defined at first use).
Linux is on my laptop (and works ok), while freebsd is on another machine.
I had thought o
Digital Brain wrote:
You sure the ISP doesn't use PPPeE?
The modem acts as a bridge. All I have to do is turn it on; it then
synchronizes with the ISP's network (PPPoA). Then I just execute
dhcpcd eth0 from the linux machine (connected to the modem) and I'm
assigned an IP and a default gat
On Thursday 01 September 2005 11:45, Digital Brain wrote:
> >You sure the ISP doesn't use PPPeE?
>
> The modem acts as a bridge. All I have to do is turn it on; it then
> synchronizes with the ISP's network (PPPoA). Then I just execute dhcpcd
> eth0 from the linux machine (connected to the modem) a
I found strange timeout errors returned by kevent() in 6.0 using
my http server named nginx. The nginx's run on three machines:
two 4.10-RELEASE and one 6.0-BETA3. All machines serve the same
content (simple cluster) and each handles about 200 requests/second.
On 6.0 sometimes (2 or 3 times per
You sure the ISP doesn't use PPPeE?
The modem acts as a bridge. All I have to do is turn it on; it then
synchronizes with the ISP's network (PPPoA). Then I just execute dhcpcd eth0
from the linux machine (connected to the modem) and I'm assigned an IP and a
default gateway in mere seconds.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:54:42AM +0200, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> Hi all.
>
[]
> #define sbspace(sb) \
> (ulmin( ( (sb)->sb_hiwat > (sb)->sb_cc ? (sb)->sb_hiwat - (sb)->sb_cc : 0), \
> (sb)->sb_mbmax > (sb)->sb_mbcnt ? (sb)->sb_mbmax - (sb)->sb_mbcnt : 0)))
Copy/paste error, there i
hello,
is it possible to use carp to create reserve(and/or load-balanced) ethernet
channel between two machines?
basic idea looks like:
machine-1 (em0)eth(em0)machine-2
machine-1 (em1)eth(reserved)--(em1)machine-2
as far as i know carp cannot allow to share the
Hi all.
I have some reccurent problems with PFKey interafce for a while, whith
ENOBUFS errors.
While tracking down the problem, I found that a test goes wrong in
sbappendaddr(), in kern_uipc_socket2.c, because the "space" variable
(an int) gets "bigger" than the result of sbspace(sb), which shlo
22 matches
Mail list logo
