Max Laier wrote:
Hello!
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 04:04, Boris Kovalenko wrote:
Hello!
Is there news on PR 82306? Will it be fixed at least with 5.5R?
In case anybody is watching here ... please try the attached diff.
The behavior has changed. Unfortunatelly I still can assign sa
Max Laier wrote:
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 02:05, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
[apologies for the cross post but it belongs both to arch and net.]
I notice that net/pfil.c and netinet/ip_fw2.c have two copies of
aisimilar but slightly different implementation of
multiple-reader/single-writer locks, wh
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 02:05, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> [apologies for the cross post but it belongs both to arch and net.]
>
> I notice that net/pfil.c and netinet/ip_fw2.c have two copies of
> aisimilar but slightly different implementation of
> multiple-reader/single-writer locks, which brings u
[apologies for the cross post but it belongs both to arch and net.]
I notice that net/pfil.c and netinet/ip_fw2.c have two copies of
aisimilar but slightly different implementation of
multiple-reader/single-writer locks, which brings up the question(s):
1. should we rather put this code in the ge
Hi, Quinton!
Friday, April 22, 2005 01:34, Q wrote:
> Err yes it is. My firewall/router at home has an uptime of 28 days and
> has 0 errrors. Looks like a duplex problem, which will explain your
> poor performance. Why it's happening is another story. Have you tried
> this motherboard using linux
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 04:04, Boris Kovalenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is there news on PR 82306? Will it be fixed at least with 5.5R?
In case anybody is watching here ... please try the attached diff.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:16:01AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:54:21AM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> > I'm getting the following panic on my RELENG_6 test box:
> >
> > xl1f0: BUG: if_attach called without if_alloc'd input()
> >
> > Where should I be looking to trac
Donatas wrote:
Hello Julian,
Do the users have to have real IP addresses or can they have NAT'd addresses?
In other words,
do they have INCOMING sessions or just outgoing sessions?
actualy there are hundreds of users with registered(real) IP's. So nat'ing,
looking the most
logical solution
