another sbdrop panic on 6.0-BETA2

2005-08-02 Thread Evgueni V. Gavrilov
# kgdb kernel.debug /usr/crash/vmcore.26 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you

Re: running out of mbufs?

2005-08-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:49:32PM +1000, Dave+Seddon wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm trying to do some performance testing of a content filtering system, so > I'm trying to get very high HTTP throughput. I've got 4 * HP DL380s with > 3.4G Xeon processors (hyper threading) and 1 G RAM, 2 onboard B

Re: running out of mbufs?

2005-08-02 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Dave+Seddon wrote: For some reason, the 'current' can be WAAAY higher than the 'max' which seems very odd. I've tried putting the 'max' right up to 5 billion, however it only goes to 2.1 billion. Argh, kris beat me to mentioning the statistics problem. Well, I'd add anot

Re: running out of mbufs?

2005-08-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:55:39AM +, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:54:16PM +1000, Dave+Seddon wrote: > > So as for the system losing all network connectivity, do you have any > > suggestions? > > No, it must be some unrelated problem. P.S. Return mail to your address bo

Re: running out of mbufs?

2005-08-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:54:16PM +1000, Dave+Seddon wrote: > So as for the system losing all network connectivity, do you have any > suggestions? No, it must be some unrelated problem. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PRO

Re: running out of mbufs?

2005-08-02 Thread Dave+Seddon
So as for the system losing all network connectivity, do you have any suggestions? regards, Dave Kris Kennaway writes: On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:49:32PM +1000, Dave+Seddon wrote: Greetings, I'm trying to do some performance testing of a content filtering system, so I'm trying to get

Re: running out of mbufs?

2005-08-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:49:32PM +1000, Dave+Seddon wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm trying to do some performance testing of a content filtering system, so > I'm trying to get very high HTTP throughput. I've got 4 * HP DL380s with > 3.4G Xeon processors (hyper threading) and 1 G RAM, 2 onboard BGEs

running out of mbufs?

2005-08-02 Thread Dave+Seddon
Greetings, I'm trying to do some performance testing of a content filtering system, so I'm trying to get very high HTTP throughput. I've got 4 * HP DL380s with 3.4G Xeon processors (hyper threading) and 1 G RAM, 2 onboard BGEs, and 2 * 2 port EM. Using FreeBSD5.4-stable (as of 2005/08/02) and d

Re: what to replace splnet in FreeBSD 5.x?

2005-08-02 Thread Ed Maste
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:16:58PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > >Updated version of the patch at: > > > >http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20050523-multicast.diff > > > >Spl-related cleanups (no longer useful documentation of old > >synchronization in many places), lock order hard-co

Re: RE: NAT-T support for IPSec stack

2005-08-02 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi, > > Yes ( as a user ) but I am not a FreeBSD developer. I think there was > > initially resistance from open source groups to integrate this support > > due to patent issues ( maybe just WRT usage w/ IKEv1 ) but must have > > been resolved as both O

Re: RE: NAT-T support for IPSec stack

2005-08-02 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:34:54PM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote: > Woohoo!!! Thanks!!! I was just checking poking around for this last week > and wondering when someone was going to bring this support to FreeBSD. Well, I made at least one guy being happy today, cool :-) > >For some months now, i

RE: NAT-T support for IPSec stack

2005-08-02 Thread Matthew Grooms
Woohoo!!! Thanks!!! I was just checking poking around for this last week and wondering when someone was going to bring this support to FreeBSD. >For some months now, ipsec-tools is now the "official" version of >racoon, the KAME's isakmp daemon. I hope it shows up in ports soon. The racoon port

NAT-T support for IPSec stack

2005-08-02 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
Hi all. For some months now, ipsec-tools is now the "official" version of racoon, the KAME's isakmp daemon. Ipsec-tools support NAT-Traversal (RFCs 3947 / 3948), but needs some kernel support for that. This kernel support has been done for the Linux 2.6 Kernel for some time, has been done for

Re: SSL lib

2005-08-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 03:45:15AM -0700, sibel kanmaz wrote: > hello I have some problems with openssl: > wclient2.o(.text+0x3a6): undefined reference to `SSL_new' > wclient2.o(.text+0x3b9): undefined reference to `BIO_new_socket' > wclient2.o(.text+0x3d0): undefined reference to `SSL_set_bio' > w