Re: bpf writes on tun device

2005-06-06 Thread Matthew Luckie
> > If I was to pursue this, would someone on this list consider committing the > > work to current? > ... > > + case DLT_NULL: > > + sockp->sa_family = AF_UNSPEC; > > + if(strcmp(ifp->if_name, "tun") == 0) > > + hlen = sizeof(int); > > + else > > +

Re: FREEBSD between two trunks

2005-06-06 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Nickolay Kritsky wrote this message on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 21:38 +0400: > There was an old funny thing about bridging vlans: if you bridge vlanXX > interfaces without bridging parents - do not forget to put parent in up > and promiscuous mode. For 4.6 kernel it also required some patching. > What

RE: FREEBSD between two trunks

2005-06-06 Thread Nickolay Kritsky
There was an old funny thing about bridging vlans: if you bridge vlanXX interfaces without bridging parents - do not forget to put parent in up and promiscuous mode. For 4.6 kernel it also required some patching. What version are you running? Nick -Original Message- From: John-Mark Gurney

Re: kern/81813: [ PATCH ] ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG with unspecified icmp_nextmtu are ignored

2005-06-06 Thread Andre Oppermann
Synopsis: [ PATCH ] ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG with unspecified icmp_nextmtu are ignored Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->andre Responsible-Changed-By: andre Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jun 6 17:32:39 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Take over. Patch just needs MFC. http://www.freebsd.or

Re: kern/81813: [ PATCH ] ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG with unspecified icmp_nextmtu are ignored

2005-06-06 Thread Maxim Konovalov
The following reply was made to PR kern/81813; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dan Lukes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kern/81813: [ PATCH ] ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG with unspecified icmp_nextmtu are ignored Date:

Re: kern/81813: [ PATCH ] ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG with unspecified icmp_nextmtu are ignored

2005-06-06 Thread Tilman Linneweh
Synopsis: [ PATCH ] ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG with unspecified icmp_nextmtu are ignored Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: arved Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jun 6 16:03:57 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to freebsd-net Mailinglist for evaluation

Re: how to active the received function when the data arrived the socket in kld

2005-06-06 Thread Vlad GALU
On 6/6/05, shiner chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Inorder to impliment the dynamic load freeback policy ,I wrote a kld on > the front-end of cluster server for collecting the load of back nodes. > I don't want the acceptive thread to detect the data arrived socket > continuously,because ,which w

Re: bpf writes on tun device

2005-06-06 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:16:38PM +1200, Matthew Luckie wrote: > If I was to pursue this, would someone on this list consider committing the > work to current? ... > + case DLT_NULL: > + sockp->sa_family = AF_UNSPEC; > + if(strcmp(ifp->if_name, "tun") == 0) > +

Current problem reports assigned to you

2005-06-06 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2005/05/19] ia64/81284 net Unaligned Reference with pf on 5.4/IA64 1 problem total. No

Re: bpf writes on tun device

2005-06-06 Thread Matthew Luckie
> I can successfully write BPF packets up to 1500 bytes in size (1496 IP > bytes without the address family integer). Writes larger than this > return EMSGSIZE. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2005-May/007371.html Just for the record, the patch below fixes this on 4.11; the same