RE: 5.2/5.3 wi0 "2mbit bug"

2005-05-05 Thread Matt Sealey
I read the first link; but when I looked in the files, there is no field frmhdr and the code does not flow the way the article suggest (wi_start doesn't call that function..) The patch looks better, I will back up the source and try and apply it. We will see.. -- Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

5.2/5.3 wi0 "2mbit bug"

2005-05-05 Thread Matt Sealey
Does anyone have a patch I can apply to a 5.3 kernel in order to make it send/receive at 11mbit instead of the 2mbit rate? I have seen lots of DISCUSSION about it but no hard fact about how to fix it. Apparently it was fixed in CURRENT (I am not adventurous to build and check) but I only need thi

Re: ipfw broken with bridge under 5.x (5.3 and 5.4)

2005-05-05 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:18:51PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > > > > I believe I am seeing similar problems to you, though uptime for me is > > generally measurable in days rather than minutes. I've found that > > adding an ex

Degraded TCP performace between 4.9 and 4.11

2005-05-05 Thread Marian Durkovic
Hi all, recently we've found serious performance degradation for TCP connections between FreeBSD 4.9 and 4.11 at larger packet sizes. We're using two identical machines with Intel PRO/1000 82547EI chipset, which were able to run wirespeed at all packet sizes when 4.9 was installed on both of

any netgraph traffic shaper?

2005-05-05 Thread Donatas
hello verybody, are there any solutions on ethernet or atm(ubr mode) level traffic shaping with netgraph on 5.3 BSD? (i've ng_dummy, which doesnt's seems to be prepared to run under 5.3) ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/