Re: Virtual network stacks in FreeBSD?

2005-05-04 Thread Julian Elischer
Ragnar Lonn wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: Ragnar Lonn wrote: Hello all, Does anyone know if virtual network stack support (as implemented at http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/) is on the roadmap for future FreeBSD releases? that depends on who you are talking to :-) the problems are not with th

Re: if_tap unaligned access problem

2005-05-04 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello, i think we have few options here: 1) revert back original tapwrite function that was changed in v. 1.48 and set offset to 2 bytes in top mbuf 2) change current version of tapwrite so it would m_prepend and m_pullup mbuf after m_uiotombuf 3) change m_uiotombuf to accept one more parameter

Re: if_tap unaligned access problem

2005-05-04 Thread Sten Spans
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Sten Spans wrote: On Mon, 2 May 2005, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: Hello, i think we have few options here: 1) revert back original tapwrite function that was changed in v. 1.48 and set offset to 2 bytes in top mbuf 2) change current version of tapwrite so it would m_prepend and m

Re: ipfw broken with bridge under 5.x (5.3 and 5.4)

2005-05-04 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > > I believe I am seeing similar problems to you, though uptime for me is > generally measurable in days rather than minutes. I've found that > adding an explicit "allow all from any to any" and then removing it > again seems to get

Re: ipfw broken with bridge under 5.x (5.3 and 5.4)

2005-05-04 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 15:24 +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > It appear that ipfw doesn't work with bridge in 5.3 and 5.4. The > symptoms are that the bridge stops forwarding packets altogether, > for me a few minutes after it is set up. It takes a > > # net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=0 && sleep 5 &&

Re: ipfw broken with bridge under 5.x (5.3 and 5.4)

2005-05-04 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
El Miércoles, 4 de Mayo de 2005 16:47, Jose M Rodriguez escribió: > El Miércoles, 4 de Mayo de 2005 16:24, Josef Karthauser escribió: > > It appear that ipfw doesn't work with bridge in 5.3 and 5.4. The > > symptoms are that the bridge stops forwarding packets altogether, > > for me a few minutes

Re: ipfw broken with bridge under 5.x (5.3 and 5.4)

2005-05-04 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
El Miércoles, 4 de Mayo de 2005 16:24, Josef Karthauser escribió: > It appear that ipfw doesn't work with bridge in 5.3 and 5.4. The > symptoms are that the bridge stops forwarding packets altogether, > for me a few minutes after it is set up. It takes a > > # net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=0 && slee

ipfw broken with bridge under 5.x (5.3 and 5.4)

2005-05-04 Thread Josef Karthauser
It appear that ipfw doesn't work with bridge in 5.3 and 5.4. The symptoms are that the bridge stops forwarding packets altogether, for me a few minutes after it is set up. It takes a # net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=0 && sleep 5 && net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1 to get it back up and running, which i

Re: Virtual network stacks in FreeBSD?

2005-05-04 Thread Ragnar Lonn
Julian Elischer wrote: Ragnar Lonn wrote: Hello all, Does anyone know if virtual network stack support (as implemented at http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/) is on the roadmap for future FreeBSD releases? that depends on who you are talking to :-) the problems are not with the concept of virtual