bge hardware vlan

2005-04-07 Thread Gennady Proskurin
Does anyone have bge(4) network card with working hardware vlan support? I have one, and it works with vlans only with the following patch. This is fresh FreeBSD-6-CURRENT, HP workstation xw4100, built-in network card. --- /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c Fri Mar 18 09:14:18 2005 +++ if_bge.c

Re: Disable NFS client cache (or other traffic reduction methods)

2005-04-07 Thread Mohan Srinivasan
Hi, Unfortunately, there's no way in the FreeBSD NFS client to disable data caching. Setting the ac* values to 0 will have the effect of disabling the attribute cache, which means that you'll never fetch attributes from the cache, but force an over-the-wire getattr call each time. But this does

Re: FreeVRRPd project status

2005-04-07 Thread Matthew Smith
Julian Elischer wrote: Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: "Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Really? Ive never been able to compile it on any 5.x box. [...] bison -y -p wack -d config_gram.y config_gram.y:91.10: parse error, unexpected ":", expecting ";" or "|" config_gram.y:191.10: parse erro

Re: Disable NFS client cache (or other traffic reduction methods)

2005-04-07 Thread Eli Dart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> Is there a way to disable client-side caching? I've looked, and >> can't seem to find one. Or, do I have this wrong and there is >> something else that is causing this? > > > Take a look through "man mount_nfs" for: > > -a Set the re

Re: Disable NFS client cache (or other traffic reduction methods)

2005-04-07 Thread Charles Swiger
On Apr 7, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Eli Dart wrote: Looking at the packet contents, it appears to be fetching back the last few blocks of the log file. My guess is that this is the client keeping its NFS cache fresh. The client is never, ever, ever going to read that file (or any file on that filesystem) o

Disable NFS client cache (or other traffic reduction methods)

2005-04-07 Thread Eli Dart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi List, We've just deployed a new syslog server infrastructure consisting of two hosts -- one NFS server that has a large disk array attached via fibre channel and one NFS client that receives syslog messages, mounts the server's disk, and writes to

Re: FreeVRRPd project status

2005-04-07 Thread Julian Elischer
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: "Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Really? Ive never been able to compile it on any 5.x box. [...] bison -y -p wack -d config_gram.y config_gram.y:91.10: parse error, unexpected ":", expecting ";" or "|" config_gram.y:191.10: parse error, unexpected ":", expec

Re: FreeVRRPd project status

2005-04-07 Thread Mike Jakubik
On Thu, April 7, 2005 11:12 am, Dag-Erling Smørgrav said: > You're probably using the wrong version of bison. Yes, Theo Schlossnagle already mentioned this to me. The compile process was using the port version of bison, removing it solved the problem. Thanks. ___

Re: FreeBSD Firewall + NAT Traversal + IPsec

2005-04-07 Thread John Mok
The problem is that some visitors might need to connect to the home VPN gateway(s) from my work office. Thus, we could not decide which VPN gateway solution they use. On the other hand, what is the status of FreeBSD on the support of NAT-T? Would it be supported in FreeBSD in later issues, e.g.

Re: FreeBSD Firewall + NAT Traversal + IPsec

2005-04-07 Thread Tom Skeren
John Mok wrote: Dear Tom, Thank you for your quick reply. I would like to know more on the issue. To my understanding, since the source address of the IP packet from the client would be modified on the NAT, normally it would fail AH check on the IPsec VPN gateway, or the FreeBSD NAT has built-in

Re: FreeBSD Firewall + NAT Traversal + IPsec

2005-04-07 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, John Mok wrote: Hi, > Thank you for your quick reply. > > I would like to know more on the issue. To my understanding, since the > source address of the IP packet from the client would be modified on the > NAT, normally it would fail AH check on the IPsec VPN gateway, or the >

Re: FreeBSD Firewall + NAT Traversal + IPsec

2005-04-07 Thread John Mok
Dear Tom, Thank you for your quick reply. I would like to know more on the issue. To my understanding, since the source address of the IP packet from the client would be modified on the NAT, normally it would fail AH check on the IPsec VPN gateway, or the FreeBSD NAT has built-in compliance with

Re: FreeBSD Firewall + NAT Traversal + IPsec

2005-04-07 Thread Tom Skeren
John Mok wrote: Hi, I'm new to FreeBSD. Is it possible make a FreeBSD box with firewall + NAT, such that client PC(s) from the NATed internal network could connect to a VPN gateway on the Internet :- client PC - FreeBSD Firewall + NAT Internet IPsec VPN gateway 192.168.x.x/16

FreeBSD Firewall + NAT Traversal + IPsec

2005-04-07 Thread John Mok
Hi, I'm new to FreeBSD. Is it possible make a FreeBSD box with firewall + NAT, such that client PC(s) from the NATed internal network could connect to a VPN gateway on the Internet :- client PC - FreeBSD Firewall + NAT Internet IPsec VPN gateway 192.168.x.x/16

Re: FreeVRRPd project status

2005-04-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
"Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Really? Ive never been able to compile it on any 5.x box. > [...] > bison -y -p wack -d config_gram.y > config_gram.y:91.10: parse error, unexpected ":", expecting ";" or "|" > config_gram.y:191.10: parse error, unexpected ":", expecting ";" or "|" > con

Re: FreeVRRPd project status

2005-04-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's dead, I think: Cisco's lawyers started making predatory noises > about their "intellectual property". Some people from NetBSD are > working on a replacement called CARP, which you might want to check > out-- it seems that FreeBSD will be picking u