what happens with netgraph bridging?
(/usr/share/examples/netgraph/)
With netgraph bridging (using the ether.bridge example) everything works
as expected - the "local" interface promiscuously uses the same MAC
address out every physical interface.
_
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Had openbgpd ported to freebsd or is it in any progress?
If I want to install it in FreeBSD, is there any guideline for me to follow?
You have to remove the full pfkey interface and replace it with dummy
functions as it is incompatible. So tcp md5 does not work but I think it
i
I am finding the part which control carrier sense (CSMA).
I've checked atheros source code and related 802.11 source code.
But i cannot find it out.
Now i am wondering if it is controlled by HAL.
But since HAL is only provided as binary code, i cannot figure it out.
I would really appreciate if
Upon a request, I made two experiments to compare the TCP SACK behaviors
when Limited Transmit is on and off.
I put the new results at http://www.demizu.org/~noritosi/memo/2005/0320/
1. In the first RTT of the recovery mode, FreeBSD stable sends one
data segment for each duplicate ACK segm
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Sten Spans wrote:
em with jumboframes is borken atm.
It seems some drivers don't handle the jumboframes -
chained mbufs case quite correctly.
--
Sten Spans
Totally broken, or broken when used on non-i386 architectures?
Broken on alpha
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Sten Spans wrote:
em with jumboframes is borken atm.
It seems some drivers don't handle the jumboframes -
chained mbufs case quite correctly.
--
Sten Spans
Totally broken, or broken when used on non-i386 architectures?
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
___
Why not just fix the protocols which do unaligned accesses? Is speedup of
doing non-byte-wide reads when manipulating packet headers really larger
than the cost of aligning everything? I doubt it.
Your average tcp packet shoule only cause a few unaligned accesses anyway,
so we are putting in a
