Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
Eric Schuele wrote:
Alt Shift V closes the connection
sudo killall -TERM ppp
Have you ever tried -HUP (Hangup) ?
Thank you for responding. Sorry I did not get back to you sooner, I was
out of town.
Yes, I have tried it... same result.
Seems to me I must be doin
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:57AM +0100, S??awek ??ak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to have some jails configured, sharing single IP address (IPv6
> is a no-no for the time being:). Therefore I came up with an idea of
> binding them all to lo0 and assigning subsequent IP aliases as the
> addresses. The
Hi,
I need to have some jails configured, sharing single IP address (IPv6
is a no-no for the time being:). Therefore I came up with an idea of
binding them all to lo0 and assigning subsequent IP aliases as the
addresses. The requirement for the jails is to let them to receive
(the easy part) and *
After reading up on the Cisco stuff that ng_fec is meant for, I'm curious
as to whether there is a way of determining if its needed ... in my case,
I have one server, two ethernets but all attaching to the same switch ...
is there some way of determining if the interface(s) (on either hte
FreeB
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:42 pm, Jeff wrote:
> Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >On Tuesday 15 March 2005 01:14 am, Jeff Behl wrote:
> >>Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>>Jeff wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by in band. The IP address of the
> BMC is assigned via the bios and is different from what th
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
ng_fec is the NetGraph module which implements Cisco FastEtherChannel
technology. This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0
representing 2 or more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme
can be assigned by a Catalyst, bu
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
ng_fec is the NetGraph module which implements Cisco FastEtherChannel
technology. This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0
representing 2 or more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme
can be assigned by a Catalyst, but low-end models like 29
Julian Elischer wrote:
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 01:14 am, Jeff Behl wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Jeff wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by in band. The IP address of the
BMC is assigned via the bios and is different from what the OS
later assigns. With imiptool w
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 01:14 am, Jeff Behl wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Jeff wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by in band. The IP address of the
BMC is assigned via the bios and is different from what the OS
later assigns. With imiptool we can turn on/powercy
Jeff Behl wrote:
Michael Vince wrote:
Just out of interest has any one got serial console to work with this
IPMI stuff?
I was looking at regular 9pin serial alternatives since Dell machines
normally only have 1 serial port and I prefer 2.
yep, we've gotten this to work, but again only with linu
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but didn't think this was doable ...
Why not:
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.2/24
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.2/24 alias
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.10/32 alias
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.5/32 alias
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.254/32 alias
ifconf
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
> > This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0 representing 2 or
> > more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme can be assigned by a
> > Catalyst, but low-end models like 2950 and 3550 can only balance traffic
> > based on the least signific
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 01:14 am, Jeff Behl wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Jeff wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by in band. The IP address of the
BMC is assigned via the bios and is different from what the OS
later assigns. With imiptool we can turn on/powercyc
so i poked through the broadcom driver code for linux
(http://www.broadcom.com/drivers/downloaddrivers.php) and found quite a
few mentions of ASF/IPMI in the code. a little research shows that the
Alert Standard Forum (ASF) defines the Remote Management Control Packet
(RMCP) used in IPMI-ove
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 01:14 am, Jeff Behl wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Jeff wrote:
> >> I'm not sure what you mean by in band. The IP address of the
> >> BMC is assigned via the bios and is different from what the OS
> >> later assigns. With imiptool we can turn on/powercycle/monitor
>
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Nikolay Kryukov wrote:
It's the case of incorrect configuration. Equal mac addresses must not
exist in different ports on the same vlan on catalyst switches. They may
cause problems like:
'k, now I'm confused ... I hadn't noticed that, but how is it that they
are 'equal'? I
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0 representing 2 or
more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme can be assigned by a
Catalyst, but low-end models like 2950 and 3550 can only balance traffic
based on the least significant bit(s) of MAC-
It's the case of incorrect configuration. Equal mac addresses must not exist in
different ports on the same vlan on catalyst switches. They may cause
problems like:
http://www.ciscotaccc.com/lanswitching/showcase?case=K19174025
and, consequently, high latency.
MGF> Testing my network, I just notic
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
>
>>> I'm plugging everything into a Cisco 2924 ... is there some way, either on
>>> the FreeBSD side, or Cisco, of 'cleaning this up'?
>>
>> Try ng_fec. It works ok with 2950, not sure about 2924 though.
>
> man page is a bit short ... what exactly is ng_fec, a
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
I'm plugging everything into a Cisco 2924 ... is there some way, either on
the FreeBSD side, or Cisco, of 'cleaning this up'?
Try ng_fec. It works ok with 2950, not sure about 2924 though.
man page is a bit short ... what exactly is ng_fec, and how does it affect
t
> Testing my network, I just noticed the following:
>
> --- 200.46.204.1 ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 399.664/407.119/420.315/8.267 ms
>
> --- 200.46.208.1 ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets r
21 matches
Mail list logo
