Hi,
I am trying to use a network pseudo-device to do (bidirectional) IPC
between 2 processes. Why such a weird thing? Well, one of the
processes (S) is a simulator of a NIC we're implementing in HW. I want
the other process (O) to always interact with a network device,
BPF-style.
My idea is, if
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to how vulnerable FreeBSD is to this I do not know nor do I know if
we should bother to do anything about it. What, in particular are you
worried about here? Also, if you consider this a security issue you
should probably also include the security t
Eric Schuele wrote:
Sam Leffler wrote:
Kevin Downey wrote:
I have a dlink card that uses the ath0 driver. a DLW520. And when a
try to connect to an AP I get an error in dmesg "ath: association
failed (reason 25)" followed by the BSSID of the AP. Is there a list
of "reasons" somewhere? I have tried
Exactly!!!
There was a bug in our radius code :D
thanks again,
Bikrant
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 11:36, fooler wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bikrant Neupane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 11:01 PM
> Subject: Session Timeo
At Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:46:46 +0100,
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
>
> How vulnerable is FreeBSD to the recently announced technique for
> individually identifying computers by the clock slew apparent in TCP
> packets? If it is vulnerable to this, will there be any plans to
> address the vulnerabili
Sam Leffler wrote:
Kevin Downey wrote:
I have a dlink card that uses the ath0 driver. a DLW520. And when a
try to connect to an AP I get an error in dmesg "ath: association
failed (reason 25)" followed by the BSSID of the AP. Is there a list
of "reasons" somewhere? I have tried on an open AP a clo
How vulnerable is FreeBSD to the recently announced technique for
individually identifying computers by the clock slew apparent in TCP
packets? If it is vulnerable to this, will there be any plans to
address the vulnerability?
--
Anthony
___
freebsd
> Hello (just signed up to this list),
>
> I am wondering if anyone on the list has any experience using FreeBSD 5.3
> as a
> router in a high traffic environment? I am building a development cluster
> here
> and have decided to try using FreeBSD as my main network router instead of
> somethi
-Original Message-
From: John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:33:56 +0100
Subject: Traffic statistics
>
> I'm looking for some kind of software that can show me how much diffrent
> ports in my firewall are used and where the traffic is origina
I'm looking for some kind of software that can show me how much diffrent
ports in my firewall are used and where the traffic is originating
This way I can see if we get an attack over http from so I quickly can stop it in the FW
/John
___
freebsd-net@
Nickolay A. Kritsky wrote:
Hello John,
You can use two ways:
1. Add 'unregistered_only yes' to your natd.conf
2. Run natd on xl2 with -reverse option
If I were you I would do the first one.
I tried that with this rule on top
ipfw add divert natd log all from any to any via xl0
Well that handles all
11 matches
Mail list logo
