Hi,
I have been trying to get WLAN working on my laptop.
The built-in card is Gemtek WL850, which is using
(as far as I understand) using conexant prism chip.
As there is no driver for this, I have been trying to
use Windows XP drivers with if_ndis.
I have managed to get if_ndis.ko built ok. When I
Awesome. I have been thinking about tracking current anyway. Thanks a bundle.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Kevin Downey wrote:
I have a dlink card that uses the ath0 driver. a DLW520. And when a
try to connect to an AP I get an error in dmesg "ath: association
failed (reason 25)" followed by the BSSID of the AP. Is there a list
of "reasons" somewhere? I have tried on an open AP a closed AP with
WEP w/o
Kelly Yancey wrote:
You'll have a similar issue with BPF programs you write: you'll either
need to skip over the vlan tag header or not, depending on whether you
snagged the packet from the parent interface or the vlan interface.
Indeed. Thanks!
We skipped 12 bits ahead and everything is working
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:18:25PM -0800, José María González wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to create several discard interfaces on 4.9-RELEASE, and I'm
> having 2 problems. This is what I see (comments started by //):
>
> # ifconfig -a
> de0: ...
> lo0: ...
> // these are my original interfaces
Hi,
I'm trying to create several discard interfaces on 4.9-RELEASE, and I'm
having 2 problems. This is what I see (comments started by //):
# ifconfig -a
de0: ...
lo0: ...
// these are my original interfaces
# kldload if_disc
# ifconfig -a
de0: ...
lo0: ...
ds0: flags=8008 mtu 65532
// surpri
Hello (just signed up to this list),
I am wondering if anyone on the list has any experience using FreeBSD 5.3 as a
router in a high traffic environment? I am building a development cluster here
and have decided to try using FreeBSD as my main network router instead of
something like the Cisco
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> Charlie Schluting wrote:
> > Charles Swiger wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 9, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> >>
> >>> More importantly, I'm trying to figure out if a bpf read will see
> >>> them as well. Any insight on this?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
Tony Sarendal wrote:
None of our 7200's will come anyway near those numbers.
Are you sure it's cisco you are using =)
;) I can't argue for any 7200 in any situation, but again let me
repeat, that the numbers I gave are for pure, fast-switched/CEFed
routing. I think this discussion should migrate to
Charlie Schluting wrote:
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 9, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Charlie Schluting wrote:
More importantly, I'm trying to figure out if a bpf read will see
them as well. Any insight on this?
Yes, or it will if you use promisc mode and an appropriate BPF filter:
So promisc is enabled in
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 9, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Charlie Schluting wrote:
More importantly, I'm trying to figure out if a bpf read will see them
as well. Any insight on this?
Yes, or it will if you use promisc mode and an appropriate BPF filter:
So promisc is enabled in my case.
This seems to im
On Mar 9, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Charlie Schluting wrote:
So with tcpdump -e it somehow magically sees vlan tags.. even if
hardware stripping of the tags is enabled. How?
tcpdump normally puts the interface into promiscuous mode.
Perhaps retry using the '-p' flag?
More importantly, I'm trying to figure
I have a dlink card that uses the ath0 driver. a DLW520. And when a
try to connect to an AP I get an error in dmesg "ath: association
failed (reason 25)" followed by the BSSID of the AP. Is there a list
of "reasons" somewhere? I have tried on an open AP a closed AP with
WEP w/o WEP and I always ge
Hi,
So with tcpdump -e it somehow magically sees vlan tags.. even if
hardware stripping of the tags is enabled. How?
More importantly, I'm trying to figure out if a bpf read will see them
as well. Any insight on this?
TIA
-Charlie
___
freebsd-net@free
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Mark Tinguely wrote:
For related curiousities, would you tell me if the FreeBSD a Uniprocessor
or multiprocessor?
Let me give you some details:
FreeBSD 4.10 p5, single Cyrix 250MHz cpu, and the nic is a Netgear
identified as so:
sis0: port 0xee00-0xeeff mem
0xfebff000-0xfebf
Hi Theo,
I think you must overwrite your patch @ 2016 line, with this one:
@@ -2016,7 +2018,7 @@
idx = sc->rl_ldata.rl_tx_prodidx;
while (sc->rl_ldata.rl_tx_mbuf[idx] == NULL) {
- IF_DEQUEUE(&ifp->if_snd, m_head);
+ IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE(&ifp->if_snd, m_head);
While normally not able to pour water out of a boot with
instructions on the heel, on Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:51
our dear friend Mark Tinguely uttered this load of codswallop:
> Thinking about the trace a little more, the Apple send buffer
> must be set much lower (about 18-19KB ballpark) than
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 22:15, Åukasz Bromirski wrote:
>
> Yes, the 7206VXR with NPE-G1 can quite easily do 1Mpps, but the
> figures usually published are for routing. FreeBSD will also do
> this on properly configured hardware - google should return some
> useful usenet posts and discussions.
>
Hi list,
i have some problems with isakmpd, on FreeBSD 5.3 STABLE with
isakmpd-20041207 from ports, when using the Default tag in
phase 1 of the isakmpd conf. I use this tag to build up a
roadwarrior configuration for users with dynamic and therefor
unknow ipaddresses. The problem i realise is, th
Thinking about the trace a little more, the Apple send buffer must be set
much lower (about 18-19KB ballpark) than the FreeBSD recieve buffer (56 KB).
If these settings were simular, the Apple machine should be providing
more data as the FreeBSD gives the window updates - this would give
the FreeB
Howdy,
On my FreBSD 5.3-p5 box, the "re" ethernet driver doesn't support altq.
Here's a patch to convert if_re.c to use the IFQ macros for altq
compatibility.
--- /usr/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c.old Tue Feb 1 21:37:26 2005
+++ /usr/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c Tue Feb 1 22:20:04 2005
@@ -1203,7 +12
Getting VMware network to network can be hard. But that's life: no pain, no
gain. Again, you can ask quagga port man: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . I think he knows
a lot about multipath routing with or without quagga.
PS: to all -net people. I think that such question is quite often here. Maybe
we can a
In fact, the biggest problem with me is that I don't have any development
machines for building a test network, in other words I cannot do experiments
at anytime I want. I usually need to plan the experiment in details and do
the experiment with some idle hot backup machine in the network, or I
Here is my $0.02
I have seen such a problem with TCP flows between FreeBSD 4.5 and SUN servers.
The same scenario - ACKs getting lost on the one side of the link, which was
clearly seen on the tcpdumps taken on each sides at one time. I am not so good
in theory, but as quick fix - setting Sun's
1. Yes I think that should be enough.
2. Um, that's a good question. I guess I don't know the answer.
you can ask quagga maintainer about the details of quagga multipath routing.
Maybe it just changes the gateway, say 10 times in a sec? Maybe it patches
kernel binary code, who knows? The best way
dst-ip is not supported on one side of the switch.
src-mac does not work too, due to the fact that this would lead to a biased
result, causing most of the traffic goes thru the first link.
dst-mac would not work as the machine is sending traffic to a single router.
fxp0: 1.2.3.1/30
fxp1: 1.2.3.5/
Why can't you use dst-ip hashing? You are using /24 network for your client
machines, no? If FEC uses IP addresses for hashing that you are ok. If it uses
MAC addresses for hashing, you need to test something else.
Regarding your initial post here is my proposal:
fxp0: 1.2.3.1/30
fxp1: 1.2.3.5/3
Hi,
I am using cisco 29xx and 3xxx switches. The problem with FEC is that I have
no way to use dst-ip hashing as the load balancing option on these two
switches, and that would cause biased utilization on a certain link only,
i.e. impossible to utilize 2*100=200Mbps.
and...if I were really to u
hello
I do not think you should mess a lot with interdomain routing here. Such a
scenario (multiple uplinks from the same ISP) IMHO is better be solved on the
layer 2.
What you need is some technology that utilizes two Ethernet ports at once.
About a week or two ago on this list was discussed s
Hi Goran,
On my NPE-G1 running just IOS 12.3(12a) cpu utilization was something
like 70-90% but with IOS 12.3(11)T3 it is 20% since this one has NAT
inside CEF
Yes, exactly.
However if you compare prices of PC hardware and Cisco hardware
> decent PC hardware with FBSD seems like more acceptable s
Hi,
The main problem is that I have no idea at all how should I setup
everything..and what do I need from my ISP..I just know it was possible,
but I can't recall the details inside, and a simple google did not return
anything helpful to me.
I agree with you that fbsd (or any other linux) is
31 matches
Mail list logo
