On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 11:59:21AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> If possible, the first thing would be to try moving to the head of
> 5-STABLE to see if the bug has already been fixed there already or not. A
> significant number of interesting bugs have been fixed since the release
> of 5.3.
Are
I've updated my workstation from FreeBSD 4.11 to FreeBSD 5.3. I've a strange
error with the NFS connection from my workstation to the nfs server.
The NFS server is a sun sparc V100 running solaris 5.9.
The FreeBSD 5.3 client gives connection lost / alive again messages after an
hour of running.
"Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 01:00:33PM +0100 I heard the voice of
> Julian H. Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > Oh, OK. So I removed every line with a # & all blank lines, leaving just
> > ---
> > nameserver 127.0.0.1
> > nameserver 194.221.32.6
> > nameserve
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 01:00:33PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Julian H. Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Oh, OK. So I removed every line with a # & all blank lines, leaving just
> ---
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
> nameserver 194.221.32.6
> nameserver 194.221.87.2
> ---
> It didnt help.
"Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 11:56:50AM +0100 I heard the voice of
> Julian H. Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
> > "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
> > > > but though `tower' & `thin' are also OK with non fully qualified name
> > > > `thin',
> > > > running nslookup localy on `fla
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 11:56:50AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Julian H. Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
> "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
> > > but though `tower' & `thin' are also OK with non fully qualified name
> > > `thin',
> > > running nslookup localy on `flat' now gives errors:
> > [...]
> > > /e
"Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
> > but though `tower' & `thin' are also OK with non fully qualified name
> > `thin',
> > running nslookup localy on `flat' now gives errors:
> [...]
> > /etc/resolv.conf has
> > # domainberklix.org
No, sorry, it's not that, I only indented with tab to make
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Julian Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
[...]
> but though `tower' & `thin' are also OK with non fully qualified name `thin',
> running nslookup localy on `flat' now gives errors:
[...]
> /etc/resolv.conf has
> # domainberkli
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:23:09AM +0100, Marko Lerota wrote:
> I have two nic bge0 and bge0, and I would like them
> to have the same IP address in case that my redundant
> switch stop responding. Bridge is not an option,
> I tried with netgraph but I did not succeed.
> Does anyone have some s
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:23:09AM +0100, Marko Lerota wrote:
M> I have two nic bge0 and bge0, and I would like them
M> to have the same IP address in case that my redundant
M> switch stop responding. Bridge is not an option,
M> I tried with netgraph but I did not succeed.
M> Does anyone have s
I have two nic bge0 and bge0, and I would like them
to have the same IP address in case that my redundant
switch stop responding. Bridge is not an option,
I tried with netgraph but I did not succeed.
Does anyone have some solution?
I followed the examples from google groups and I stuck with
du
11 matches
Mail list logo
