Guy Helmer wrote:
A while back, Maxim Konovalov made a commit to usr.sbin/ngctl/main.c
to increase its socket receive buffer size to help 'ngctl list' deal
with a big number of nodes, and Ruslan Ermilov responded that setting
sysctls net.graph.recvspace=20 and net.graph.maxdgram=20 was
I've made a nbr of BRIDGE boxes w/ various revs of FBSD, but I always
get stuck w/ one configuration. Currently, I have a firewall/gateway
box (also FBSD) which connects to the 'Net via a DSL modem. If I place
my BRIDGE on the exterior leg (bet the gateway and the DSL modem), it
works perfec
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:43:35PM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
>
>I'm sorry, I mis-wrote. My ng_tee is actually modified to only passes
>packets to the r2l/l2r hooks if they are connected, otherwise packets are
>passed directly to the left/right hooks (so it's an optional divert), so
>
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Hi Guy,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:03:31AM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
A while back, Maxim Konovalov made a commit to usr.sbin/ngctl/main.c to
increase its socket receive buffer size to help 'ngctl list' deal with a
big number of nodes, and Ruslan Ermilov responded that sett
Hi Guy,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:03:31AM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
> A while back, Maxim Konovalov made a commit to usr.sbin/ngctl/main.c to
> increase its socket receive buffer size to help 'ngctl list' deal with a
> big number of nodes, and Ruslan Ermilov responded that setting sysctls
> net
Joe Schmoe wrote:
Hello,
I have three totally distinct network connections at
my office. We have an ISDN line, a T1, and a DSL
connection. I do not need to worry about the
particulars of each connection, because I actually
have an ethernet drop for each of them - someone else
does the routing/cs
A while back, Maxim Konovalov made a commit to usr.sbin/ngctl/main.c to
increase its socket receive buffer size to help 'ngctl list' deal with a
big number of nodes, and Ruslan Ermilov responded that setting sysctls
net.graph.recvspace=20 and net.graph.maxdgram=20 was a good idea
on a s
The PIX is already doing NAT, so I'd have to put a NAT router in front of
another
NAT router (how inefficient!) to do that. But it might well be the only option
if the PIX is that limited.
--Brett
At 12:16 AM 2/4/2005, Nickolay Kritsky wrote:
>Brett, I do not think that PIX has an equivalent
