> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:01:29 -0800,
> "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think I have found a problem with TCP when run over IPv6.
> I set my MSS for TCP to 1460 to allow a full 1500 byte MTU to be
> utilized on my systems. (Yes, I see that this does break some things
> like
Tom Skeren wrote:
Been pulling my hair out. Anybody know of a resource for a fairly
complex tunneling scheme. My needs are such that a central hub "Star"
style tunneling scheme simply will not be efficient.
At some point, complex VPN configurations become more work to setup and
maintain than s
Been pulling my hair out. Anybody know of a resource for a fairly
complex tunneling scheme. My needs are such that a central hub "Star"
style tunneling scheme simply will not be efficient.
Any info would be appreciated.
TMS III
___
freebsd-net@freebs
I think I have found a problem with TCP when run over IPv6.
I set my MSS for TCP to 1460 to allow a full 1500 byte MTU to be
utilized on my systems. (Yes, I see that this does break some things
like communicating via links where PMTUD is blocked and one or more
links restrict MTU to some size less
We have a windows mailserver that relays its outbound to a fbsd
gateway. We changed to a different fbsd gateway running 4.10. Windows
then began having trouble sending to 4.10. Windows "netstat -an"
shows dozens of lines like this:
source IP desitination IP
Yes, I believe the kqueue version of squid would show much better
results. Unfortunately it fails to compile and I have yet the time to
try mucking with it more. I'll get back to the list when I am able to
get it up and running...
jeff
Mohan Srinivasan wrote:
Following up to a mail from Jeff
Following up to a mail from Jeff Behl and Sean Chittenden back in Dec.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2004-December/006074.html
>From your description, it looks like moving a kqueue based Squid will
help considerably (it looks like there is a version of Squid that
is kqueue based
