On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, 16:01+1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 02:50:09PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> >> now a dingo branch, named "dingo". The dingo branch contains
> >> all of src, not just sys, as I suspect there are userland bits
> >>
0n Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 02:50:09PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> now a dingo branch, named "dingo". The dingo branch contains
>> all of src, not just sys, as I suspect there are userland bits
>> we'll want to do. I know I'll be doing userland things.
At Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:32:27 -0500,
Bosko Milekic wrote:
> You develop in your individual branch, test your changes. If all is
> well, you push into dingo, where changes get tested with respect to
> other dingo-related changes (which have not yet been pushed into HEAD).
> When it's all ready, ever
I'm still working on the problem. I'm waiting on a cert renewal that
seems to have gotten stuck.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 07:10:51PM +1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 03:16:27AM -0500, James wrote:
>
> > /me thinks he's asking for q-in-q tunneling feature.
>
> What is 'q-in-q tunneling' ?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=q-in-q+tunneling
-J
--
Jam
0n Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 03:16:27AM -0500, James wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 03:03:49PM -0800, Mike Hunter wrote:
> > On Dec 17, "Brooks Davis" wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:22:02PM +0200, Donatas wrote:
> > > > hello,
> > > > i'd like to
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004, Heinz Knocke wrote:
> > Index: sys/pci/if_sk.c
> > (...)
>
> I tried this one and seems to work corectly :) Jumbograms were used, data
> stream was smooth,
> I haven't seen any error messages in system log.
> In rough tests I had a little bit better speeds than with this one:
- Original Message -
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Heinz Knocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Marvell 88E8001 on sk0 and RELENG_5_3 - big problems
> would you mind trying this patch. It should only a
Ok, the whole discussion to date led to how VLAN traffic wasn't being
registered by IPFW in my system. I think that it'll probably be too late
for a code change to fix my problem, so I'm going to go the route of
changing the network configuration.
I've rebuilt to 4.10 and.. And I had no luck there
This way he can push changes back into 'dingo' before pushing them back
into HEAD. It makes a lot of sense, actually, to do this sort of 3-tier
approach when multiple people are working on different parts of a larger
sub-project, like for example dingo.
HEAD (top, must work) <-- (dingo, pre-prod
On Sunday 19 December 2004 05:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For those who use PerForce and want to work on Dingo there is
> now a dingo branch, named "dingo". The dingo branch contains
> all of src, not just sys, as I suspect there are userland bits
> we'll want to do. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> For those who use PerForce and want to work on Dingo there is
Did you update the Dingo project page with the stuff I sent you about
three weeks ago?
--
Andre
> now a dingo branch, named "dingo". The dingo branch contains
> all
Hi Mike,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, 04:03-0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
[...]
> Although this isn't a perfect fix, I think that it should be
> acceptable for the vast majority of systems, and I'd like to get it
> in before 4.11-release ships. To be conservative, I'll probably
> choose a value like 5, w
13 matches
Mail list logo
