> -Original Message-
> Totally true and problem get worse when you already have the equipament
> and have to implement a solution over it.
> We are also using a script at this moment but it doesn't do load
> balance. What it only do is to check if the current provide
> are okay, and if not,
Totally true and problem get worse when you already have the equipament
and have to implement a solution over it.
We are also using a script at this moment but it doesn't do load
balance. What it only do is to check if the current provide
are okay, and if not, it change the default route to the o
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 03:03:49PM -0800, Mike Hunter wrote:
> On Dec 17, "Brooks Davis" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:22:02PM +0200, Donatas wrote:
> > > hello,
> > > i'd like to ask if there's any possibility to pass double tagged vlan
> > > packets through freebsd 5.x routers?
> > >
On Dec 17, "Brooks Davis" wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:22:02PM +0200, Donatas wrote:
> > hello,
> > i'd like to ask if there's any possibility to pass double tagged vlan
> > packets through freebsd 5.x routers?
> > andhow many level1 vlans are supported on one parent device?
>
> I don
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:22:02PM +0200, Donatas wrote:
> hello,
> i'd like to ask if there's any possibility to pass double tagged vlan packets
> through freebsd 5.x routers?
> andhow many level1 vlans are supported on one parent device?
I don't know what happens with double tagged vlan pac
Hello,
I've recently got a ralink wireless pci network card. i have
been trying to get it to work with ndis but all seems to
work until the first arp/ip packets are being passed over the
interface.
I spotted on the internet a project which produced recently
a gpl driver for the rt2500 wireless
Would changing over to RELENG_4 remove these headaches for me?
Maybe if I patch the code you pointed out to be ETHERTYPE_VLAN instead of
_IP, then ipfw will filter only VLAN traffic instead of IP traffic. This I
would be willing to do until a patch became mainstream.
So if the above works, I coul
Hello Andrew,
Friday, December 17, 2004, 12:47:46 PM, Andrew Seguin wrote:
AS> Looking through the ethereal dumps, I have spotted one difference.
AS> Packets for the console look like this:
AS> Frame 1 (106 bytes on wire, 106 bytes captured)
AS> Ethernet II, Src: MAC1, Dst: MAC2
AS> Intern
hello,
i'd like to ask if there's any possibility to pass double tagged vlan packets
through freebsd 5.x routers?
andhow many level1 vlans are supported on one parent device?
maybe there are some solutions in netgraph sphere?
thanx inadvance
Donatas Gendvilas
SC Lithuanian ra
My apologies: Sometimes I feel just so stupid... hitting reply replies to me
instead of the list. Ooops!
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Seguin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 10:16 AM
To: 'Andrew Seguin'
Subject: RE: Curiosity in IPFW/Freebsd bridge. [more]
Ok,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, 19:25-0500, Josh Kayse wrote:
> I was working on some test machines and using ifstated which uses the
> KQUEUE event to register changes in link state. I noticed that
> ifstated did register any events having to do with the em interfaces.
> Looking through the code, it doesn'
11 matches
Mail list logo
