em0 link_state

2004-12-16 Thread Josh Kayse
I was working on some test machines and using ifstated which uses the KQUEUE event to register changes in link state. I noticed that ifstated did register any events having to do with the em interfaces. Looking through the code, it doesn't appear to support the KQUEUE events. Am I correct in say

bridging, ipf

2004-12-16 Thread Andrew Heyn
Hi, Here is my setup: fxp0: no ip -> switch -> (computer with ip: 200.200.200.147, gateway 200.200.200.145) ^ | bridged | \/ fxp1: 200.200.200.146, 148, 149, 150 -> -> (internet) ^ ipf/ipnat | \/ fxp2: 192.168.1.1 -> switch -> lots of computers with 192.168.1.x addresses (all use 1

Curiosity in IPFW/Freebsd bridge.

2004-12-16 Thread Andrew Seguin
Hello, First off, a great thanks to this list who pointed out my hardware issue (rl series cards). I now have the bridge on two Intel Pro NICS and I use the on-board sis card for console access, and my average ping time is a 2ms average to the router, passing about a solid 2MB/s. My current sit

RE: Load Balancing

2004-12-16 Thread Mitch (Bitblock)
> > Why dont you all do yourselves a favor and go out and buy one of those > home dsl/cable modems that have 2 ports and provide load balancing > instead. > [Mitch says:] The only ones I've seen were rather expensive and aren't modem's - they are routers... so you have to still have your ADSL mo

RE: Load Balancing

2004-12-16 Thread Mike Jakubik
Mitch (Bitblock) said: > Short answer is "Yes". > > For basic failover, I've used a script which monitors link status and > function (by pinging or connecting to a remote host). Failover is > accomplished by switching the default route. > > Using ipfw fwd statements, you can make both links functi

RE: Load Balancing

2004-12-16 Thread Mitch (Bitblock)
> NiY wrote: > > >Greetings! I have yet to find a definitive answer on this subject, so > >I was hoping someone would let me know the official way to go about > >this, or if it's even possible. > > > >We have two ADSL services coming into out building. We would like to > >use them both on one netw

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-12-16 Thread Brian Somers
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:01:00 -0400, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > wrote: > > >Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > >>wrote: > >> > >> > >Seriously thou

Re: HP NC7170 Dual Port PCI-X 1000T Gigabit Server Adapter

2004-12-16 Thread KC Somaratne
Hi, Thanks for your reply. I noticed that this indeed was using the Intel 82546EB chip after sending the e-mail to the list. Anyway I can feel a bit more comfortable in getting this now! thnks n rgds -kc. Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16-12-2004 09:46:02 PM: > On Thu, Dec 1

Re: HP NC7170 Dual Port PCI-X 1000T Gigabit Server Adapter

2004-12-16 Thread Sten Spans
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, KC Somaratne wrote: Hi, Is there going to be any support for the above HP EtherNet card in FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE? Most of the HP cards listed in the hardware notes for this relase seem to be end-of-life by HP..! Most of the hp ethernet cards are rebadged broadcoms -- Sten Sp

Re: HP NC7170 Dual Port PCI-X 1000T Gigabit Server Adapter

2004-12-16 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 07:54:01PM +0800, KC Somaratne wrote: > Hi, > > Is there going to be any support for the above HP EtherNet > card in FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE? > > Most of the HP cards listed in the hardware notes for this > relase seem to be end-of-life by HP..! > According to the HP websit

Re: Divert sockets no longer behave like connected (SS_ISCONNECTED is removed from so->so_state)

2004-12-16 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:49:17AM +0500, ??? ? wrote: ?> I'm having this application (VPN daemon) which ?> uses divert sockets for sending stuff http://www.targeted.org/nest/ ?> It worked fine under 5.3-RELEASE but broke after ?> recent upgrade to FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE. ?> ?> An attempt

Re: NAT problem with public network

2004-12-16 Thread Nickolay A. Kritsky
Hello John, You can use two ways: 1. Add 'unregistered_only yes' to your natd.conf 2. Run natd on xl2 with -reverse option If I were you I would do the first one. Thursday, December 16, 2004, 1:06:03 PM, John Angelmo wrote: JA> Hello JA> I have a network setup like this: JA> xl0: External:213

HP NC7170 Dual Port PCI-X 1000T Gigabit Server Adapter

2004-12-16 Thread KC Somaratne
Hi, Is there going to be any support for the above HP EtherNet card in FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE? Most of the HP cards listed in the hardware notes for this relase seem to be end-of-life by HP..! thnks in adv, -kc. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list htt

ath driver - help needed

2004-12-16 Thread Milan Obuch
Hi, I am evaluating ath driver with Senao AR5212 chip based miniPCI card. Motherboard used is Geode based WRAP. While it works well in modes 11b and 11g, performance in 11a mode I need is suboptimal, as said in man page - even worse. However, test with newer driver, albeit with linux system, wor

NAT problem with public network

2004-12-16 Thread John Angelmo
Hello I have a network setup like this: xl0: External:213.115.251.220 xl1: DMZ: 213.115.148.64/28 xl2: Internal: 192.168.20.0/24 Now my problem seems to be that I need to get external connection for my Internal network but not nating the DMZ To simplify it all /etc/natd.conf has this line: interf