Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 18:21:05, josemi wrote about "Re: FreeBSD kernel pppd -
mppe/mschapv1/2/radius support":
>> MPPE isn't possible due to lack of support in kernel for PPP terminal
>> discipline.
>> For others, you can use port (net/pppd23) as base. This is the most
>> reasonable variant now
Hello,
For those who use TCPDUMP, how much bandwidth have you
been able to monitor with it without dropping packets?
I'm considering putting some new servers running BSD
in place purely for sniffing capability, and am quite
content with TCPDUMP, but it won't be a very wise
investment if I start lo
Greetings! I have yet to find a definitive answer on this subject, so
I was hoping someone would let me know the official way to go about
this, or if it's even possible.
We have two ADSL services coming into out building. We would like to
use them both on one network, using a multi-homed FreeBSD b
El Sábado, 4 de Diciembre de 2004 23:19, Valentin Nechayev escribió:
> Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 13:24:31, anthonyv wrote about "FreeBSD kernel
pppd - mppe/mschapv1/2/radius support":
> > After extensively googling FreeBSD pppd's support for mppe,
> > mschapv1, mschapv2 and radius, I've stumbled into
On 2004-12-06 15:32, Gerald Heinig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've run into a possible bug in ping(8) while investigating a strange
> duplicate packet effect in our driver.
> The effect shows up on other drivers and I believe it's due to a counter
> overflow in ping.
> Basically, leav
Hi all,
I've run into a possible bug in ping(8) while investigating a strange
duplicate packet effect in our driver.
The effect shows up on other drivers and I believe it's due to a counter
overflow in ping.
Basically, leave ping -f on a gigabit link for a few days (for medium to
large values of
> > > > I have some stuff wrt [Fast]IPSEC and your problem in the works and
> > > > it should become ready around christmas time (loadable [Fast]IPSEC, at
> > > > least for IPv4).
> > >
> > > While this way of 'fixing' the IPSEC problem works it is rather gross
> > > and not very stylish. I prefer
0n Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 05:52:30PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Nice, needs some cleanup though. Once you have cleaned it up you can run
> it either through me or [EMAIL PROTECTED] He is more of a IPv6 fan than I
am (in my
> book IPv6 is broken by design^TM).
Why ?
- aW
Synopsis: proper TCP_NOPUSH/TCP_CORK compatibility
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->andre
Responsible-Changed-By: andre
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 6 11:35:38 GMT 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Take over.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24959
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2002/07/26] kern/41007 net overfull traffic on third and fourth adap
o [2003/10/14] kern
10 matches
Mail list logo
