On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Max Laier wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 19:45, Petr Holub wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wonder if it is possible to use the new pf firewall together with
> > bridging as it is possible to use it with ipf and ipfw.
>
> Unfortunately the PFIL_HOOKS in bridge.c don't
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:25:56PM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> But noted strong differences between atm boards and adsl modems.
>
> - atm boards are hardware assisted. usb adsl modems are bare assisted.
> - atm boards support better signaling, multiple channels, ... usb adsl
> modems just o
El Viernes, 3 de Diciembre de 2004 20:58, Andre Oppermann escribió:
> Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > El Viernes, 3 de Diciembre de 2004 17:50, Roman Kurakin escribió:
> >>Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I've got a eagle usb adsl modem and get ready to work on FreeBSD
> >>>support for it.
>
On Friday 03 December 2004 20:38, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:26:25AM -0800, Gilbert Tsang wrote:
> > After more than a day's mail-archive reading and FreeBSD 4.10 source
> > code browsing, I don't think ALTQ has been integrated into 4.x branch
> > (I know it is for the 5.x bra
Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
El Viernes, 3 de Diciembre de 2004 17:50, Roman Kurakin escribió:
Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
Hi,
I've got a eagle usb adsl modem and get ready to work on FreeBSD
support for it.
[...]
My first idea was a sppp based one, that can be ported to all xBSD.
But now I think that a
El Viernes, 3 de Diciembre de 2004 17:50, Roman Kurakin escribió:
> Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've got a eagle usb adsl modem and get ready to work on FreeBSD
> > support for it.
> > [...]
> >
> >My first idea was a sppp based one, that can be ported to all xBSD.
> > But now I think t
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:26:25AM -0800, Gilbert Tsang wrote:
> After more than a day's mail-archive reading and FreeBSD 4.10 source
> code browsing, I don't think ALTQ has been integrated into 4.x branch
> (I know it is for the 5.x branch). Is that correct? I was wondering if
> some folks would k
After more than a day's mail-archive reading and FreeBSD 4.10 source
code browsing, I don't think ALTQ has been integrated into 4.x branch
(I know it is for the 5.x branch). Is that correct? I was wondering if
some folks would know the status of ALTQ on FreeBSD 4.x; alternatively
I'd appreciate pat
I'm currently continuing on Luigi's work with Andre on the
"ARP rewrite, layer 2 separation from FIB code" task.
The work includes IPv6.
Please make a note of it.
-- Qing
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Friday 03 December 2004 18:19, Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to connect two ADSL lines from the same telco using ppp but
> it breaks when setting the second interface. The problem seems an
> address conflict between them, like this:
>
> # ifconfig tun1 192.168.100.1 192.168.100.
Hi,
I tried to connect two ADSL lines from the same telco using ppp but
it breaks when setting the second interface. The problem seems an
address conflict between them, like this:
# ifconfig tun1 192.168.100.1 192.168.100.254 netmask 255.255.255.255
# ifconfig tun2 192.168.100.2 192.168.100.254
At Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:39:24 +0100,
Michal Mertl wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> I looked at the project page and noticed one thing I found code for.
>
> Task: Rework code in FreeBSD's ip_icmp.c such that ICMP responses for
> forwarding can be throttled also. Call badport_bandlim() before icmp_error()?
>
>
On Thursday 02 December 2004 19:45, Petr Holub wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if it is possible to use the new pf firewall together with
> bridging as it is possible to use it with ipf and ipfw.
Unfortunately the PFIL_HOOKS in bridge.c don't work too well for pf (or ipf
for the same reason) thus y
I looked at the project page and noticed one thing I found code for.
Task: Rework code in FreeBSD's ip_icmp.c such that ICMP responses for
forwarding can be throttled also. Call badport_bandlim() before icmp_error()?
Andres Oppermann wrote simple patch for it and posted it on net@ on January
200
14 matches
Mail list logo
