hello, everyone.
i've got a funny network layout (it's in transition) and am seeing
behaviour from FreeBSD 5.2.1 that's different from an Alcatel 6600-24
and a Nortel 1424T router. that is, when i use FreeBSD to do my routing
everything works, but when i use either of the other routers things
Hello people.
I have ipcad installed on 2 PC's running 5.3-RELEASE and 5-STABLE from
Nov 21. ipcad (ports/net-mgmt/ipcad) provides ability to control them
by rsh (ipcad implement rsh server by yourself). While using pf with
primitive rulesets rsh stops its working. It seems like pf drop short
packe
Hi,
After extensively googling FreeBSD pppd's support for mppe, mschapv1,
mschapv2 and radius, I've stumbled into a mess of patches for very random
versions of pppd and FreeBSD.
Does anyone have a running setup of FreeBSD's pppd with support for these
features, or perhaps a patch that encompasses
Iasen Kostov wrote:
Hi,
this is a small patch which will make bridge stats
look nicer (or at least look some way :) ), because
this is current situation:
-- Bridging statistics (bdg) --
Name In Out Forward DropBcastMcast
Local Unknown
vlan5:1 709303965749269168687
*Problem: Poor performance for freebsd transparent gateway.
*Situation:
I need to install a simple firewall for a school network I am administering.
We have about 100 computers active, generating a stream of approximately
80-90K packets per minute for a load I estimate* to be a little under
10Mbp
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:47:15 -0800
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you tested this in production and does it work well? If so I believe
> > it should be committed, but I'd defer to Alfred for further review.
>
> It looks non0invasive enough to be safe. Please see if you can
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 12:13:16PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
[ snip ]
>
> There is no LINK3 flag :)
Heheh, good call ;)
>
> However, gif(4) does not use LINK0 flag. It was used in past. We can utilize
> it now. Any objections?
I have no objections myself as long as this option is separated
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 09:55:10PM -0500, James wrote:
J> On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 05:06:41PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
J> > Back to this problem:
J> >
J> > http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-net_2004/msg01305.html
J> >
J> > I've found two more people who dislike this feature of gif(4).
Synopsis: [patch] TCP should honour incoming RSTs even if the receive window is
closed
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->silby
Responsible-Changed-By: silby
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 26 08:09:32 GMT 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Patch committed, hook into the regression test fram
