Pawel kindly supplied a tcpdump of an entire connection. We identified
the point where pf drops the packet because it sees a violation of the
advertised sequence window.
I think we can show that there is some problem with the TCP code,
possibly related to SACK. Hence, I'd like to ask anyone famila
Hi All,
I tried running pimd and forwarding multicast traffic on vlan interface
with a freebsd derived kernel, but it seems that kernel failed to receive
multicast traffic on the vlan interface.
I guess the reason partly lies in vlan_ioctl's SIOCSIFFLAGS
handler doesn't take care IFF_ALLMULTI f
You mention diffrent ways to fine-tune pf. I'm particularly interested in
the number of states. I have a situation where I'm running pf around 8000
states and the box seems to perform quite beautifully, I have increased the
max states to 100K to cover large peaks which can occur, however I have
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 08:49:19PM -0500, James wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 10:36:46AM -0800, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> [ snip ]
> >
> > If I understand correctly, you want the kernel to queue packets until
> > layer 2 address resolution is complete. Right now we don't do this. If
> > there is
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 10:36:46AM -0800, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
[ snip ]
>
> If I understand correctly, you want the kernel to queue packets until
> layer 2 address resolution is complete. Right now we don't do this. If
> there is no route to a destination, packets will be dropped.
The KAME ipv6
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:05:06AM +0200, Martin Eugen wrote:
> At the beginning my intention was to use the routing sockets
> mechanisms, and say, to issue a 'missing route' message to some
> userland daemon capable of resolving those complex addresses (the
> resolving mechanism is generally a loo
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 01:04 am, Michael Vince wrote:
> Hey all.
>
> I have been googling around the Internet for information about IPSEC and
> FAST_IPSEC for freebsd on the Internet and wondered what gives best
> performance
> when I came across this http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/netperf/
>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:52:36 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:42:39AM -0200, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s wrote:
> > >So I started to look at the ARP
> > >code, but it of course lacks the kernel - userland communication
> > >interface. I would appreciate
Robert,
I'm running an ethernet over TCP bridge using a combination of the native
ethernet bridge support and the tap driver. Basically, a daemon sits on
/dev/tapX and bridges ethernet frames using a small header over a TCP
connection. The bridge support is loaded as a kld, as is the tap support,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:42:39AM -0200, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s wrote:
> >So I started to look at the ARP
> >code, but it of course lacks the kernel - userland communication
> >interface. I would appreciate any ideas about what would be the easier
> >way to implement such a thing where the kernel
Martin Eugen wrote:
Hi there,
I'm currently trying to implement some networking protocols in the
kernel. I would like to ask a few questions, but first, let me explain
some details about those protocols: the network is composed of smaller
subnets connected through gateways. Hosts have a fairly com
> I'm running an ethernet over TCP bridge using a combination of the native
> ethernet bridge support and the tap driver. Basically, a daemon sits on
> /dev/tapX and bridges ethernet frames using a small header over a TCP
Yup i think I have seen the same thing while I was using a combination
of v
I'm running an ethernet over TCP bridge using a combination of the native
ethernet bridge support and the tap driver. Basically, a daemon sits on
/dev/tapX and bridges ethernet frames using a small header over a TCP
connection. The bridge support is loaded as a kld, as is the tap support,
and bo
Please test:
!
! With the changes from mii.h rev 1.4 to adopt NetBSD checks
! using BMSR_MEDIAMASK it was missed that in rev 1.26 of mii.c
! in NetBSD there had been another change:
!
! : When probing for a PHY, look at the EXTSTAT bit in the BMSR, as well,
! : not just the media mask. This p
Hey all.
I have been googling around the Internet for information about IPSEC and
FAST_IPSEC for freebsd on the Internet and wondered what gives best
performance
when I came across this http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/netperf/
It has some nice graphs / figures on performance of IPSEC and FAST_IPS
Hi there,
I'm currently trying to implement some networking protocols in the
kernel. I would like to ask a few questions, but first, let me explain
some details about those protocols: the network is composed of smaller
subnets connected through gateways. Hosts have a fairly complex global
addresses
> "Max" == Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello Max,
Max> Very true. It's more worthwhile to classify on gif and queue on
Max> the real interface.
How would you achieve this setup ?
I can only think about this way (assuming gif0 tunnel packets flow thru
ep1) :
ext_if="ep1"
tunnel_
17 matches
Mail list logo
