Hi everybody!
I'm try configure bridge on FreeBSD box.
Box configuration:
%uname -srp
FreeBSD 5.3-RC1 i386
%ifconfig
xl0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
options=9
ether 00:04:79:68:02:e6
media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
status: no carrier
fxp0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:24:06 -0800, Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:13:21 -0800, Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:20:10 +0200, Ari Suutari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > The counters for queue 1 keeps increasing when I
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:13:21 -0800, Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:20:10 +0200, Ari Suutari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > The counters for queue 1 keeps increasing when I do a ftp out even for
> > > non-ACK packets but the other counters for queue 2-4 doesn't
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:20:10 +0200, Ari Suutari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The counters for queue 1 keeps increasing when I do a ftp out even for
> > non-ACK packets but the other counters for queue 2-4 doesn't move at
> > all so it seems like everything is going out one queue instead of what
>
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:09:00 +0100, Joost Bekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:16:42AM -0800, Vincent Poy wrote:
>
>
> > 63004 667879129410867 queue 1 tcp from any to any tcpflags ack out
> > 63005 1 40 queue 2 tcp from any to any dst-port 22
Hi,
The counters for queue 1 keeps increasing when I do a ftp out even for
non-ACK packets but the other counters for queue 2-4 doesn't move at
all so it seems like everything is going out one queue instead of what
the rules actually say. I have one pipe configured as 480Kbit/sec
which is what rul
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:16:42AM -0800, Vincent Poy wrote:
> 63004 667879129410867 queue 1 tcp from any to any tcpflags ack out
> 63005 1 40 queue 2 tcp from any to any dst-port 22,23 out
> 63006 38782 3364689 queue 2 udp from any to any not
> dst-port 80,4
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2002/07/26] kern/41007 net overfull traffic on third and fourth adap
o [2003/10/14] kern
Hi,
I don't know how to explain my problem but it goes something like this...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2:05am][/home/vince] >> ipfw show
00049 1557131244839199 skipto 100 ip from 208.201.244.224/29 to any
00050 12072800468 917651580916 divert 8668 ip from any to any via xl0
00100 69518
Thank you all for your advice. I'll look into netgraph(4) and sendfile(2). If I
have anything worth sharing after I've played, I'll follow-up here.
Thanks again.
Ollie
--
Ollie Cook Systems Architect, Claranet UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20 7685 8065
_
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:42:52AM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Ollie Cook wrote:
>
> >Good afternoon,
> >
> >I am currently writing a potentially high bandwidth (think fileserver)
> >application which will proxy data from one PF_INET socket to another (no
> >reason
> >
Hi,
But that gives us 2 blocks of identical code to maintain. To me that
doesn't
seem The Right Way(tm), but I haven't yet thought of a way that is better.
My pseudo-code was more trying to point out the needed functionality.
I wouldn't say either that just copying and pasting the similar bl
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Ollie Cook wrote:
Good afternoon,
I am currently writing a potentially high bandwidth (think fileserver)
application which will proxy data from one PF_INET socket to another (no reason
it has to be PF_INET, but that's how the application stands).
In actual fact, I know in adva
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>ip_output()
>{
> #if defined (IPSEC) || defined(FAST_IPSEC)
>pfil_hooks()
> #endif
> #ifdef IPSEC
>kame_ipsec_stuff()
> #endif
> #ifdef FAST_IPSEC
>fast_ipsec_stuff()
> #endif
> #ifndef FAST_IP
14 matches
Mail list logo
