Re: (KAME-snap 8822) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H(B wrote: > > Btw, is there any particular reason why net.inet.ip.rtexpire > > automatically dynamically re-adjusts itself (here, it's typically > > around 10 or 12), while net.inet6.ip6.rtexpire does not? > > Hmm, good point

confusion with natd

Hello FreeBSD Users, I have been playing with OpenVPN for a while, and have successfully configured pretty simple tunnel between local router (FreeBSD, which NATs LAN into inet) and remote host. Now my next target is to route some of the computers in the LAN into above VPN tunnel - that's wher

Re: How to use FreeBSD/Dummynet to fragment IP packets

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Andrew Wenlang Zhu wrote: Does any one know how to use Dummynet to fragment packet? Or any other open source software can achieve this? Thanks, Andrew I don't think that dummynet can fragment packets. The program you're looking for is fragrouter, I think it's in ports. Mike "Si

Re: aio patch for review.

* Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040930 21:19] wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:18:14AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > properly cover the socket buffer for operations that need locking. > > > > Just to be clear, your point is that soreadable() and sowriteable() > should be performed with th

Re: aio patch for review.

On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:18:14AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > properly cover the socket buffer for operations that need locking. > Just to be clear, your point is that soreadable() and sowriteable() should be performed with the corresponding socket buffer locked. Correct? If so, yes, pleas

How to use FreeBSD/Dummynet to fragment IP packets

Hello: I use a freebsd system running Dummynet as a middle box to test network behavior. The setup likes this: System A - FreeBSD with Dummynet System B Network traffic flows between System A and B, and the traffic is a mix of TCP, UDP and ICMP. I need the Dummynet sys

Re: (KAME-snap 8820) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:04:05 +0300 (EEST), > Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > Unfortunately, I can't. The when my SSH session froze, and the 6to4 >> > SSH sessions as well, my first instinct was 'oh, crap', and knee-jerk >> > push of reset button (because the box has no keyb

Re: if_bge with (was: Re: Strange things on GBit / 1000->100 /net.inet.tcp.inflight.* )

"Raphael H. Becker" wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 01:16:44AM +0200, Raphael H. Becker wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 12:16:20AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > Would you mind trying a 5.3 to 5.3 transfer but the target 5.3 box forced to > > > only 100Mbit full-duplex? Same statistics

default resolver(5) configuration and behavior of functions like gethostbyname(3)

Hello all. Please consider following two questions: 1. According to the resolver(5) manual page the default number of times the resolver will send a query to each of its name servers is defined as RES_DFLRETRY in resolv.h standard header file. Actually there was no RES_DFLRETRY in the resolv.h bef

aio patch for review.

properly cover the socket buffer for operations that need locking. please review. Index: vfs_aio.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c,v retrieving revision 1.176 diff -u -r1.176 vfs_aio.c --- vfs_aio.c 23 Sep 2004 14:

Re: (KAME-snap 8820) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H(B wrote: > > Unfortunately, I can't. The when my SSH session froze, and the 6to4 > > SSH sessions as well, my first instinct was 'oh, crap', and knee-jerk > > push of reset button (because the box has no keyboard attached).