Re: ospf / gif / packets not pushed into gif tunnel

2004-09-18 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:11:46PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > gif-interface on server: > 13:28:30.220792 10.10.12.1 > 10.10.12.2: icmp: echo request > fxp-interface on server: > 13:28:30.291934 IP 218.185.88.254 > 192.168.1.1: IP 10.10.12.1 > 10.10.12.2: > icmp 64: echo request seq 51

ospf / gif / packets not pushed into gif tunnel

2004-09-18 Thread Edwin Groothuis
Hello, I'm trying to get dynamic routing working between two private networks. A gif tunnel is created between the two networks. The central server (FreeBSD 4.8) has 10.10.12.1/32 on its side of the tunnel, the remote (FreeBSD 5.2.1.) has 10.10.12.2/32 on its side of the tunnel. Static routes are

Re: better MTU support...

2004-09-18 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 19:05 +0200: Ok, finally got a switch (and gige cards, if_re needs work) capable of jumbo frames.. > John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > In a recent experiment w/ Jumbo frames, I found out that sending ip > > frames completely ignores the MTU set

Strange Bridge Issues

2004-09-18 Thread Karim Fodil-Lemelin
Hi, I have applied Luigi's patch to a FBSD 4.8 kernel to be able to use fwd rules in ipfw with a BRIDGE. I have to say its a very cool feature. Now, there is two side of this, one good and one that I really need to fix. The good side is it works in this configuration: CLIENT (fx

Re: DVB card

2004-09-18 Thread Vincent Jardin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would be interested in getting some feedbacks about people who are using these boards and these drivers too. If you need a DVB stack that supports IPv4/IPv6/Ethernet/MPLS over assymetric links, you can be in touched directly with me or 6WIND.

Re: Strange things on GBit / 1000->100 / net.inet.tcp.inflight.*

2004-09-18 Thread Raphael H. Becker
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 03:15:07AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > I'm not sure this is a "physical" problem. > > The high number of out-of-order packets on your 4.10 machine is very > suspicious. You're talking about http://rhb.uugrn.org/FreeBSD/bugs/5.x/1000-to-100/check_3_target.txt ? Maybe