"Raphael H. Becker" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 01:11:13AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > I'm unable to reproduce your problem.
> >
> > Usually in these cases there is an ethernet duplex mismatch somewhere.
> > Can set the network cards and the switches to fixed 1000 or 100 full-duplex?
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 01:11:13AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'm unable to reproduce your problem.
>
> Usually in these cases there is an ethernet duplex mismatch somewhere.
> Can set the network cards and the switches to fixed 1000 or 100 full-duplex?
Yes, one of my first tests. Both machi
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 12:16:20AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Hmmm... Without getting the TCP statictics back to zero it's hard to correlate
> any data.
As explained in PM, I rechecked on another "target"-machine. Both
machines were rebooted before test,
source:
net.inet.tcp.rfc3042: 1 ->
Raphael H. Becker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:30:31PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
rebooted the "source"-machine to get a defined state.
Did reboot before the last test, too.
And could you do this on the 5.3 machine:
# sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc3042=0
net.inet.tcp.rfc3042: 1 -> 0
wget on t
Raphael H. Becker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:26:20PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Raphael H. Becker wrote:
# sysctl net.inet.tcp
# sysctl net.inet.tcp.hostcache.list
# netstat -s -p tcp
# netstat -s -p ip
http://rhb.uugrn.org/FreeBSD/bugs/5.x/1000-to-100/check_before.txt
http://rhb.uugrn.or
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:30:31PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
rebooted the "source"-machine to get a defined state.
Did reboot before the last test, too.
> And could you do this on the 5.3 machine:
> # sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc3042=0
net.inet.tcp.rfc3042: 1 -> 0
wget on target:
Length: 1,16
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:26:20PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Raphael H. Becker wrote:
> >> # sysctl net.inet.tcp
> >> # sysctl net.inet.tcp.hostcache.list
> >> # netstat -s -p tcp
> >> # netstat -s -p ip
> >
> > http://rhb.uugrn.org/FreeBSD/bugs/5.x/1000-to-100/check_before.txt
> > http://rh
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Raphael H. Becker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:48:21PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
"Raphael H. Becker" wrote:
My guess: The 5.3-Boxes send bigger TCP-Windows than our switch has
buffer for each port resulting in massive packetloss or something like
that. The sender is
Raphael H. Becker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:48:21PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
"Raphael H. Becker" wrote:
My guess: The 5.3-Boxes send bigger TCP-Windows than our switch has
buffer for each port resulting in massive packetloss or something like
that. The sender is "too fast" for the swit
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:48:21PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> "Raphael H. Becker" wrote:
> > My guess: The 5.3-Boxes send bigger TCP-Windows than our switch has
> > buffer for each port resulting in massive packetloss or something like
> > that. The sender is "too fast" for the switch or the s
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:31:44 +0700,
> Muhammad Reza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Is there any DVB card (C band) that FreeBSD kernel support ?
> please recommend us
Hidetaka IZUMIYAMA ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) of the WIDE project gave me the
following information which might help.
> 6WIND and
"Raphael H. Becker" wrote:
>
> Hi *,
>
> one of our subnets is on a GBit-Switch since last week.
> The nodes on the subnet are:
>
> 2x Dell PE350, RELENG_4_10, fxp{0,1}, 100baseTX
> 3x Dell PE2650, RELENG_5 (BETA4), bge0, 1000baseTX
> 1x Dell PE2650, RELENG_4_10, bge1, 1000baseTX
>
> The sw
donatas wrote:
Hello,
we need a 400Mbit link between two intel machines (Xeon 2.4, Raid, 512DDr, 2
ports-em(1000Mbit),2 ports-fxp(100Mbit))
configuration taken from ng_one2many man page:
_
ifconfig em0 up media 100BaseTX mediaopt
On Friday 17 September 2004 12:17, donatas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we need a 400Mbit link between two intel machines (Xeon 2.4, Raid,
> 512DDr, 2 ports-em(1000Mbit),2 ports-fxp(100Mbit))
>
>
>
> truth, we've tested direct link between em adapters in gigabit mode
> and using TCP packets 850Mbit thr
Hello,
we need a 400Mbit link between two intel machines (Xeon 2.4, Raid, 512DDr, 2
ports-em(1000Mbit),2 ports-fxp(100Mbit))
configuration taken from ng_one2many man page:
_
ifconfig em0 up media 100BaseTX mediaopt full-duplex
i
Hi *,
one of our subnets is on a GBit-Switch since last week.
The nodes on the subnet are:
2x Dell PE350, RELENG_4_10, fxp{0,1}, 100baseTX
3x Dell PE2650, RELENG_5 (BETA4), bge0, 1000baseTX
1x Dell PE2650, RELENG_4_10, bge1, 1000baseTX
The switch is a "NETGEAR Model GS516T Copper Gigabit Sw
unfortunately i wasn't terribly involved with anything but customer
site hardware, though i do recall that we used redback equipment at
the isp end. actual line vendors and switching varied depending on the
region. just as Mark stated we, eventually, switched over to customer
hardware with pppoe so
17 matches
Mail list logo
