On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 09:23:23PM -0500, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
A> Just to give an idea, I tested with iperf and this are the results:
A>
A> internal net -> xxx.xxx.xxx.1 6.93 Mb/s
A> internal net -> xxx.xxx.xxx.126.94 Mb/s
A> internet -> xxx.xxx.xxx.1 237 Kb/s
A> internet -
On Sep 3, 2004, at 6:54 AM, RRrp Toren wrote:
What you're trying to do work actually give you much benefit to
security: someone who wants to break in doesn't have to pay attention
to the DHCP lease you give them, they can just assign themselves a
good 10.0.0.x address.
I am not a believer in
> From: RRrp Toren
>
> The IP addresses here were picked for demonstration
> purposes. The actuals
> set can come from anywhere within the RFC 1918 network
> numbers. So picking a
> good IP the 1st time, in the blind, is like shooting a
> bullseye on the first
> shot in a pitchblack rang
I've made a presentation today at SUNCON'04 in Zurich, Switzerland on the new
things and changes in FreeBSD 5.3 Network Stack. You can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/
It is fairly high-level and intended for server and system administrators as
well as developers.
If you write me e
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:05 , RRrp Toren moved his mouse,
rebooted for the change to take effect, and then said:
> Nickolay A. Kritsky wrote:
>
> >Hello rip,
> >
> >Are you sure that you want only one subnet? In your case two different
> >subnets on two interfaces IMHO look much better. If you
I've made a presentation today at SUNCON'04 in Zurich, Switzerland on the new
things and changes in FreeBSD 5.3 Network Stack. You can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/
It is fairly high-level and intended for server and system administrators as
well as developers.
If you write me e
Actually I did, If you look in this mailing list archive you'll find a
patch for it. I also proposed a patch for IPSEC (with IPCOMP) to work
with a gif tunnel.
http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=IPSEC+tunnel+kfl%40xiphos.ca&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=1083615801.00042919.1083603002%4010.7.7.3&rnum=1
K
Nickolay A. Kritsky wrote:
Hello rip,
Are you sure that you want only one subnet? In your case two different
subnets on two interfaces IMHO look much better. If you are sure about
one-subnet setup than you should try to set up a bridge(4) between
them two NICs. Bridge in FreeBSD is supporting ipfw
Michel Kempes wrote:
The second problem you are having is that you can't have two NIC on the
same subnet.
Well it is possible to do but it is kind of useless to put 2 nic interfaces on
the same subnet, unless you can have 1 gbit incomming and 2 100 nic
downstreaming it over the subnet but this
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Sep 2, 2004, at 2:17 PM, rip wrote:
I am trying to make a configuration to isolate the WiFi APs on a
single segment. DHCP hands out 'good' addresses (10.0.0.x) to MACs it
recognizes and 'bad' (10.99.0.x) when the MAC does not match and is
taken from the common pool.
I th
10 matches
Mail list logo
