On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Bob Ababurko wrote:
Hello-
I have just done a portscan on my FreeBSD box running 5.2.1 and got :
PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
25/tcp open smtp
80/tcp open http
111/tcp open rpcbind
1023/tcp open netvenuechat
now, i made a faux pas when i configured this m
Hello-
I have just done a portscan on my FreeBSD box running 5.2.1 and got :
PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
25/tcp open smtp
80/tcp open http
111/tcp open rpcbind
1023/tcp open netvenuechat
now, i made a faux pas when i configured this machine and had made this a
nfs client..
On Monday 23 August 2004 21:36, Julian Elischer wrote:
> what's the result of this..?
Uhg ... I knew I was missing something.
This will re-enable the so called "early drop hack" that checks early in the
output path whether or not there is room left in the interface queue. This
reduces the workl
Hi,
I'd like to merge the following diff to RELENG_5 in order to gain performance
for the most common ALTQ setups (huge, unALTQed LAN-if and small(er), ALTQed
WAN-uplink). It is really straight forward, please look at the diff and tell
me what you think:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/sr
Hi,
I am aware that prcloning is removed in current-5, but do have a question as I
still have some boxes running 4.x custom code.
My assumption of PRCLONING existance is to assist TCP applications (i.e. host
cache) to use routing table as its caching mechanism.. Is this a correct
assumption?
An
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [1999/11/26] kern/15095 net TCP's advertised window is not scaled i
