Patch to remove the old IPv6 prefix code from -CURRENT

2004-08-16 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
Hi Folks, Enclosed is a patch against the recent -CURRENT tree which removes the in6_prefix code that has already been removed from the Kame tree by the Kame team. I would appreciate it if folks could try this out before we include this in our own tree. I

Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

2004-08-16 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:03:33PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > It seems netgraph is only build on ia64 and i386. > > > Can someone please explain why ? > > > > > I think this is an

Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

2004-08-16 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:03:33PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It seems netgraph is only build on ia64 and i386. > > Can someone please explain why ? > > > I think this is an omission from the old days. If it > survives ``make universe

Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

2004-08-16 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:37:46PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: R> > It seems netgraph is only build on ia64 and i386. R> > Can someone please explain why ? R> > R> I think this is an omission from the old days. If it R> survives ``make universe'', this should probably be R> committed. Gleb, do

Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

2004-08-16 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:03:33PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Hi, > > It seems netgraph is only build on ia64 and i386. > Can someone please explain why ? > I think this is an omission from the old days. If it survives ``make universe'', this should probably be committed. Gleb, do you feel

netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

2004-08-16 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
Hi, It seems netgraph is only build on ia64 and i386. Can someone please explain why ? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsu

Current problem reports assigned to you

2004-08-16 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [1999/11/26] kern/15095 net TCP's advertised window is not scaled i

Re: ipfilter/ipnat 3.4.35 and udp-traceroute problem

2004-08-16 Thread Pawel Malachowski
> With this ruleset, UDP-traceroute doesn't work (ICMP- works): Just feeding list archives: This problem was also described and analysed by Andre Albsmeier on IPFilter mailing list [1]. Shouldn't be IPFilter v3.4.35 backed out from RELENG_4 until fix arrives? [1] http://groups.google.pl/groups?

Re: [FreeBSD 5.2] Bandwith and packet throttling

2004-08-16 Thread Fargo Holiday
Thank you greatly everyone, derision aside, and especially Pawel. The deny loopback is strange, I assume my roommate put that in there or it is a strange default rule. And, to be honest, when I looked at the man page, I didn't see any indication that a successful rule match halted the pattern sea

Re: Changing TOS value

2004-08-16 Thread Andrew Degtiariov
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 09:42:43PM +, Thiago Pinto Damas wrote: > > But there is an ALTQ package for FreeBSD 4.10? http://www.kame.net/ (Kame contains ALTQ in itself) > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:09:52AM +0545, Bikrant Neupane wrote: > >> Hi, > >> Thanks for the reply. But my problem is s