I have a small problem with my VPN connection, It's up and running but I
can't ping the other end, I get traffic from the other end in form of:
22:17:56.114188 192.168.5.2.netbios-ns > 192.168.5.255.netbios-ns: NBT
UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
22:17:56.863179 192.168.5.2.netbios-ns
Hello,
after the base of altq has been settling in tree for some time now (without
apparent problems) it's now time for the first chunk of driver modifications.
We have been testing this off tree for some time (thanks to the many testers)
and I don't think that there will be problems with this.
On 1 Jul 2004, at 20:47, Julian Elischer wrote:
I think that nearly all languages these day shave to take into account
"what C does" and they need to have packing etc taken explicitly into
account when they do syscalls etc. so I don't think that you will have
too many problems and there should be
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2004, at 18:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > are syscall arguments packed? I know that they are defined rather
> > strangely..
>
> On OpenBSD at least, they are wrapped in unions to pad them to register
> sizes.
>
> >
> > what messages
On 1 Jul 2004, at 18:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
are syscall arguments packed? I know that they are defined rather
strangely..
On OpenBSD at least, they are wrapped in unions to pad them to register
sizes.
what messages are you having troubles with?
Usually, in my experience, 'packed' structures a
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> I'm creating Netgraph bindings for OCaml in order to play around more
> easily with various Bluetooth and Ethernet things I'm working on. It's
> all pretty straightforward except for the problem that the netgraph
> message structs aren't all pac
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
AM>On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
AM>>
AM>> If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will pack/unpack
AM>> written on C,
AM>> which will be a lib for you?
AM>
AM>Because I want to minimise the size of the foreign binding
On 1 Jul 2004, at 15:10, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
We use Netgraph from within Python, using the netgraph(3) library,
and we pack/unpack various Netgraph related structs just happily.
Speaking of "struct ng_mesg", if you pack it, it will essentially
stay the same, because I believe it was created with
Hi,
For technical (and especially customer) reasons, i setted up a firewalling solution
based on FreeBSD 4.x (kernel compiled with BRIDGE option) and ipf.
No more particular stuff. You'ld find others configuration details at the end of this
post (dmesg and more).
Now, the problem. Randomly, i
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will
pack/unpack written on C,
which will be a lib for you?
Because I want to minimise the size of the foreign bindings - this
would require C code for every single Ne
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:00:06PM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> >
> >If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will
> >pack/unpack written on C,
> >which will be a lib for you?
>
> Because I want to minimise the size of the fore
On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will
pack/unpack written on C,
which will be a lib for you?
Because I want to minimise the size of the foreign bindings - this
would require C code for every single Netgraph struct. If they we
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
I'm creating Netgraph bindings for OCaml in order to play around more
easily with various Bluetooth and Ethernet things I'm working on.
It's all pretty straightforward except for the problem that the
netgraph message structs aren't all packed (e.g. struct ng_mesg).
Th
I'm creating Netgraph bindings for OCaml in order to play around more
easily with various Bluetooth and Ethernet things I'm working on. It's
all pretty straightforward except for the problem that the netgraph
message structs aren't all packed (e.g. struct ng_mesg). This means
that it's very d
> I have Squid-2.5 running on FreeBSD 5-Current. We have 2 ppp links,
> and use them in multilink mode, through userlevel ppp.
> If one or both links fail and then come up, say, if I just turn the
> modem power off and on all the web browsing becomes very slow
> squid.
> It takes forever for squid
Hello,
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your supplied exampel of connection between two bsd/hatm machines using NG
nodes and Inet hooks works fine.
But those 2 machines works as an IP Bridge. We need Ethernet bridge. So
we've tried to connect hatm<->em adapters through netgraph and this
Hello,
firstly i'd like to apologise for an incorrect reply address - we had some
problems with lotus mails, but now it should work fine.
Your supplied exampel of connection between two bsd/hatm machines using NG
nodes and Inet hooks works fine.
But those 2 machines works as an IP Bridge. We
17 matches
Mail list logo
