On Fri, 28 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hi collegues,
>
> I'm again with the issue about node destruction process. If you
> already forgot the problem, I'll remind you: in RELENG_4 node cuts down
> all its hooks itself from shutdown method, while in HEAD it is done
> in ng_rmnode() _be
Hi collegues,
I'm again with the issue about node destruction process. If you
already forgot the problem, I'll remind you: in RELENG_4 node cuts down
all its hooks itself from shutdown method, while in HEAD it is done
in ng_rmnode() _before_ calling shutdown method. This breaks
ng_tee behavio
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 06:10:55PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> [moving the discussion from the cvs lists to -net]
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:41:52AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >
> > Y> ng_vlan(4) could send a control command to ng_ether(4) instructing
> > Y> the latter to increment the VLAN
[moving the discussion from the cvs lists to -net]
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:41:52AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> Y> ng_vlan(4) could send a control command to ng_ether(4) instructing
> Y> the latter to increment the VLAN counter on the Ethernet interface
> Y> and toggle VLAN_MTU on if the co
