> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:09:30 -0700,
> "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This should be a minor nit but, is there any reason we
> implement this this way:
> #define CMSG_FIRSTHDR(mhdr) ((struct cmsghdr *)(mhdr)->msg_control)
> instead of this wa
On Sunday 25 April 2004 17:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Here is a snapshot of the new arp code that i have been working on
> lately, based a on Andre's ideas. (I say 'ARP' for brevity, what i
> mean is the layer3-to-layer2 address translation code -- arp, aarp,
> nd6 all fit in the category).
Sorry fo
On Friday 14 May 2004 11:38, Artis Caune wrote:
<...>
> And here is the problem:
> If i watch departure events, interface renaming feature will
> flush walid rules:
>case SIOCSIFNAME:
> ...
> EVENTHANDLER_INVOKE(ifnet_departure_event, ifp);
> ... change if_xname ...
> EV
Reply-To:
Hi!
ip(4) man page says that IP_MULTICAST_IF, IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP etc.
must use local IP address of desired interface. There are (at least)
two undersirable consequents:
1) It is hard (if not impossible) to distinguish between "unnumbered"
IFF_POINTOPOINT interfaces, those share the sam
Note for the impatient: This message does not discuss the well-known
issue of reusing local addresses through setting SO_REUSEADDR. This
message is on reusing local addresses occupied by sockets belonging
to other users.
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 10:21:57PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>
> Attached b
