Re: [patch] Verify that ifaddr_byindex(foo) != NULL

2004-05-04 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:02:33AM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: ... > >On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:42:20PM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: > >> if we're going to check that > >> 0 < ifp->if_index <= if_index, it seems that we should also be > >> checking that ifp->if_index corresponds to an interface w

Re: [patch] Verify that ifaddr_byindex(foo) != NULL

2004-05-04 Thread Colin Percival
At 14:35 04/05/2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:42:20PM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: >> if we're going to check that >> 0 < ifp->if_index <= if_index, it seems that we should also be >> checking that ifp->if_index corresponds to an interface which >> still exists (rather than a

Re: mpd 3.17 + latest freebsd 5 current = build problems

2004-05-04 Thread Michael Bretterklieber
Hi, Emil Filipov schrieb: Hi list, I have just cvsup-ed my system (buildworld, buildkernel). I decided to also update my mpd installation from 3.15 to 3.17. However, I was rather unpleasantly surprised when the newly downloaded mpd port please cvsup your ports and install Mpd-3.18 thanx, bye, -- --

mpd 3.17 + latest freebsd 5 current = build problems

2004-05-04 Thread Emil Filipov
Hi list, I have just cvsup-ed my system (buildworld, buildkernel). I decided to also update my mpd installation from 3.15 to 3.17. However, I was rather unpleasantly surprised when the newly downloaded mpd port refused to compile: -- radius.

mpd 3.17 + latest freebsd 5 current = build problems

2004-05-04 Thread Emil Filipov
I have just cvsup-ed my system (buildworld, buildkernel). I decided to also update my mpd installation from 3.15 to 3.17. However, I was rather unpleasently surpirsed when the newly downloaded mpd port refused to compile: -- radius.c:29: er

Re: [4.9-R]Can I Make My DSL Connect Go Faster ?

2004-05-04 Thread Chuck Swiger
The Jetman wrote: [ ... ] Wes: I've used a couple of Internet speed tests, at different times, but always w/ the same configs. Neither config has been modified. All of the results are the same. I use ADSLGuide and DLSReports as my speed tests, which are in different continents, but both

Re: [4.9-R]Can I Make My DSL Connect Go Faster ?

2004-05-04 Thread The Jetman
- Original Message - From: "Wes Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "The Jetman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2004 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [4.9-R]Can I Make My DSL Connect Go Faster ? > > Julian: There isn't much that I can *think* to add. If knowing >

if_stf bug/feature

2004-05-04 Thread Lukasz Stelmach
Greetings. stf interface has one feature, very inconvinient for me. As far as i could read the source it returns ENETDOWN if the inet4 address of the machine's net interface (primary or the one would be used) does not match proper part of stf's address. This is ok if one has public, routable ip4 a

Re: [4.9-R]Can I Make My DSL Connect Go Faster ?

2004-05-04 Thread Wes Peters
On Thursday 29 April 2004 08:18, The Jetman wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Bruce M Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "FreeBSD Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "The Jetman" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 17:20 PM > Subject:

Re: [patch] Verify that ifaddr_byindex(foo) != NULL

2004-05-04 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:42:20PM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: > Could someone confirm for me that this looks sensible? I don't > know anything about this code, but if we're going to check that > 0 < ifp->if_index <= if_index, it seems that we should also be > checking that ifp->if_index corres

[patch] Verify that ifaddr_byindex(foo) != NULL

2004-05-04 Thread Colin Percival
Could someone confirm for me that this looks sensible? I don't know anything about this code, but if we're going to check that 0 < ifp->if_index <= if_index, it seems that we should also be checking that ifp->if_index corresponds to an interface which still exists (rather than a gap left behind

Re: MIPv6 implementation

2004-05-04 Thread Marco Molteni
On Tue, 04 May 2004 BOUVARD Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I try to find documents, "howto" on how to implement and configure > Mobile IPv6 with Free BSD version 4.9. See http://www.kame.net/ and http://www.kame.net/newsletter/ they have also a mailing list. marco __

arp issues...but WHY

2004-05-04 Thread J.D. Bronson
I have a FreeBSD 5.2.1 machine that has dual NICs. I would expect the following behavior if I placed both NICs on the same subnet (192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 for example)... But in this case they are totally unique: NIC #1 - 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 NIC #2 - 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0 Default gate

MIPv6 implementation

2004-05-04 Thread BOUVARD Bruno
Hello, I try to find documents, "howto" on how to implement and configure Mobile IPv6 with Free BSD version 4.9. But I'm unsuccessfull !! May you help me. Regards Bruno Bouvard ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list