On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:24:53PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Please test/review the following patch to the network interface cloneing
> code. This code is a major overhaul of the cloning infrastructure.
Repeat after me, always test your "trivial" last minute changes. You
need to apply the fol
At Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT),
Chance Whaley wrote:
> I have an application where I am doing quite a bit of high-touch packet
> fiddling and I am looking for opinions on which "standard" Gb NIC
> has the best driver support in 5.2 or CURRENT.
>
> In my dream world I am looking for somet
All,
I have an application where I am doing quite a bit of high-touch packet
fiddling and I am looking for opinions on which "standard" Gb NIC
has the best driver support in 5.2 or CURRENT.
In my dream world I am looking for something that supports:
- IRQ mitigation / polling (absolute m
Hi!
I asked the same questions once - but no one replied so I try once again - I've
experienced problem with TCPDEBUG kernel compilation option - it doesn't work under
5.2 - C even thou the kernel is 200% TCPDEBUG compiled. The system is quite special -
is't a small kernel with a little of modu
Hi,
My problem is the radius server only auth 1 user. In the user file
user1 Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == "user1"
Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Framed-IP-Address = 192.168.61.110,
Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.0,
Framed-Rout
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> >Can someone explain what is the goal ? Reuse a number if an
> >interface has the same name of a previously existing one and
> >the index is free ? And does it make sense, anyways, or
> >we could just simplify that code and just
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 08:58, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:53:37AM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> ...
>
> > Relevant quote from the RFC:
>
> a very appropriate one indeed, which seems to substantiate my point.
>
> >interfaces that might be added dynamically. The exact me
