On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:23:37PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:05:44PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
> > > around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able to
> > > s
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:23:37PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:05:44PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
> > > around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able to
> > > s
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:05:44PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
> > around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able to
> > see an accurate display of totals. It just seems pointless to even have
> > t
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:48:21PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Max Laier said:
>
> > Sure, you measure it ;) ... no, of course it is more expensive to update a
> > 64bit counter on a 32bit arch, but the key (once again) is descision:
> > While
> > (almost) all of the pf counters are 64bit types y
Max Laier said:
> Sure, you measure it ;) ... no, of course it is more expensive to update a
> 64bit counter on a 32bit arch, but the key (once again) is descision:
> While
> (almost) all of the pf counters are 64bit types you can configure it not
> to
> use the loginterface or whatsoever more. So
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:18:43PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Max Laier said:
>
> > There is now: pf comes with 64bit statistic counters. For now you can put
> > them on one interface only, but in future version there will be more
> > flexible statistics. Additionally there are many accounting p
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:05:44PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
> > around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able to
> > se
Max Laier said:
> There is now: pf comes with 64bit statistic counters. For now you can put
> them on one interface only, but in future version there will be more
> flexible statistics. Additionally there are many accounting programs out
> there which utilize various existing (32bit) counters or t
Brooks Davis said:
>
> Please read the archives of freebsd-net. This has been discussed
> many times. There are valid reasons for this, particularly the fact
> that 64-bit counters are much more expensive to update on 32-bit
> architectures. API breakage is also a problem. We're aware that 2^32
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
> around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able to
> see an accurate display of totals. It just seems pointless to even have
> thi
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
> around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able to
> see an accurate display of totals. It just seems pointless to even have
> thi
Hi,
I have an ASUS motherboard A7V8X-E Deluxe with onboard 10/100/1000 Mbit/s
NIC from Marvell Semiconductor.
My problem is that it sometimes lock up with the error message
sk0: watchdog timeout
The network is gone for a minute or so, then it comes back. It seems to
work better when connected
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
> around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able to
> see an accurate display of totals. It just seems pointless to even have
> this, as 4 GB i
Hello,
It seems that the byte counters (derived from netstat -nbi) reset at
around 4 GB. Is there no way around this? It would be nice to be able to
see an accurate display of totals. It just seems pointless to even have
this, as 4 GB is just not that much anymore. I know this is a 32bit
limitatio
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net NFS root configurations without dynamic
I am running v4/v6 stacks in parallel on my 802.11b network. v6 is provided via tunnel
over a DSL connection. AP is a FreeBSD 5.1R box with a PrismII based 802.11b card, the
other machines are 5.2.1R/Lucent and -CURRENT/Broadcom(ndis).
The problem now is that every download via ftp/http stalls a
Hi:
I have installed the FreeBSD4.8 and IP Filter3.4.32.
The FreeBSD BOX is used to NAT.
But , i always get the messages "in_cksum: out of data by 3" , And the IP Packets
always are droped.
How to resolve the problem?
the message is:
cat /var/log/messages
Mar 8 17:13:49 nat /kernel: in
17 matches
Mail list logo
