SOLVED: Frozen connections

2004-03-11 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Don Lewis wrote: > > I'm experiencing strange problems with HTTP connections between > > two machines connected using 100Mbit ethernet switch. > > Client is Windows 2000 SP4 (named kost), > > server is FreeBSD 4.9/Apache 1.3.27 (named www). > It looks like the client is the guilty party. The ser

Re: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking stack)

2004-03-11 Thread Petri Helenius
David Malone wrote: Mind you, Petri originally asked about evidence for two machines back-to-back, and 100ms is rather long for that (unless you're at Steven Low's lab ;-) Another interesting figure which comes to mind is whether "bursty loss" is the usual way a multigigabit optical link loses

Re: IPsec: odd behaviour with policies

2004-03-11 Thread Nick Slager
Thus spake Helge Oldach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Nick Slager: > >I have a newly created VPN between a 4.8 box and a Cisco VPN 3000 > >Concentrator. > > [ ... ] > Try using "unique" instead of "require". > > (This is my standard answer on the subject. :-)) Thanks, it works great. After re-readin

RE: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking stack)

2004-03-11 Thread Henderson, Thomas R
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Silbersack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:12 PM > To: Kevin Oberman > Cc: Brad Knowles; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking > stack) > > > SACK itself r

Re: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking stack)

2004-03-11 Thread Mark Allman
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:38:40PM -0500, Mark Allman wrote: > > > I looked for the paper I paraphrased, I'm pretty sure if was one by > > > Sally Floyd. > > > > I don't have the paper reference handy, but it's Sally's HighSpeed TCP > > work. I do happen to have a blurb on it sitting here tha

Re: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking stack)

2004-03-11 Thread David Malone
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:38:40PM -0500, Mark Allman wrote: > > I looked for the paper I paraphrased, I'm pretty sure if was one by > > Sally Floyd. > > I don't have the paper reference handy, but it's Sally's HighSpeed TCP > work. I do happen to have a blurb on it sitting here that I think > ca

Re: Broadcast storming problem?

2004-03-11 Thread Andre Oppermann
Colin Percival wrote: > > [CC: secteam, since this relates to a recent advisory] > >In http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/64053 a > problem is reported as having been introduced by the recent > TCP reassembly patch. >Could someone look into this please? Reading the descripti

Re: mpd-3.16 and PPPoE server mode on 5.2.1-RELEASE

2004-03-11 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:11:40PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: A> There is a two problems with support of PPPoE in mpd under 5.x: A> 1. sometimes loading of netgraph modules on request cause system crash. A> (You can compile in all required modules.) Have you run kldxref after installing module

Re: IPsec: odd behaviour with policies

2004-03-11 Thread Helge Oldach
Nick Slager: >I have a newly created VPN between a 4.8 box and a Cisco VPN 3000 >Concentrator. > >/etc/ipsec.conf: > >flush; >spdflush; >spdadd 192.168.1.1/32 1.2.3.4/32 any -P out ipsec >esp/tunnel/203.1.1.1-203.2.2.2/require; >spdadd 1.2.3.4/32 192.168.1.1/32 any -P in ipsec >esp/tunnel/203.2.2.2

Re: mpd-3.16 and PPPoE server mode on 5.2.1-RELEASE

2004-03-11 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. There is a two problems with support of PPPoE in mpd under 5.x: 1. sometimes loading of netgraph modules on request cause system crash. (You can compile in all required modules.) 2. PPPoE in mpd do not works now on 5.x because of ununderstandible changes in ng_tee shutdown mechanism. (Now ng