On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Jacob S. Barrett wrote:
> Now that ng_vlan has been committed to FreeBSD-5 I have come up with a
> solution for building a resilient VLAN interfaces over a VLAN trunk. I have
> a machine that exists on multiple VLANs. It has two interfaces that are
> connected to two dif
When might we see ng_vlan ported to FreeBSD-4?
--
Jacob S. Barrett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.amduat.net
"I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it."
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
Now that ng_vlan has been committed to FreeBSD-5 I have come up with a
solution for building a resilient VLAN interfaces over a VLAN trunk. I have
a machine that exists on multiple VLANs. It has two interfaces that are
connected to two different switches. The switches are trunked together as
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > > I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting
> one on top of the
> > > other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device,
> the oth
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting one on top of the
> > other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device, the other an fxp
> > (Dual-PIII 1.3Ghz) device ...
>
> Is it a Cisco Catal
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting one on top of the
> > other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device, the other an fxp
> > (Dual-PIII 1.3Ghz) device ...
>
> Is it a Cisco Catal
David Malone wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:18:34PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > [] automatically sizing TCP send buffers to achieve optimal performance
> > over a wide range of bw*delay situations. (in progress)
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> This reminded me - do you know what happened to
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:40:50PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> notion of "owner". so_cred is a cached referenced to the process
> credential of the process that created the socket...
Yes, but i need the process p_pid.
>
> VSOCK vnodes are rendezvous points for UNIX domain socket communication,
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Kiss Tibor wrote:
> I want to create a small kernel module which logs the socket operations.
> So in my module I have a socket structure, and i want to know which
> process (thread) owns that. I try to solve this problem by this way:
Sockets, as with files, can be referenced
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:07:56PM +, David Malone wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:18:34PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > [] automatically sizing TCP send buffers to achieve optimal performance
> > over a wide range of bw*delay situations. (in progress)
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> This rem
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:18:34PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> [] automatically sizing TCP send buffers to achieve optimal performance
> over a wide range of bw*delay situations. (in progress)
Hi Andre,
This reminded me - do you know what happened to the plan to implement
SACK for FreeB
I want to create a small kernel module which logs the socket operations. So in my
module
I have a socket structure, and i want to know which process (thread) owns that.
I try to solve this problem by this way:
...
struct proc *p;
struct vnode *vn;
struct filedesc *
Hello,
I'm actually trying to make some tests between 2 wireless cards
supported by the atheros driver in Freebsd 5.2.1 release. Everything
works fine except the adhoc mode. When I put both cards in adhoc mode,
no packet is going out through the wireless interface even if the status
of the interfa
Joost Bekkers wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:12:39AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:47:38PM +0100, Joost Bekkers wrote:
Hello
Are there any plans to make IPFW2 work for IPv6?
i posted some experimental code to the -network (or was it -ipfw ?) list
early in
14 matches
Mail list logo
