On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:12:39AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:47:38PM +0100, Joost Bekkers wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Are there any plans to make IPFW2 work for IPv6?
>
> i posted some experimental code to the -network (or was it -ipfw ?) list
> early in january, expect
--On Mittwoch, 3. März 2004 12:47 Uhr +0100 Joost Bekkers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Hello
|
| Are there any plans to make IPFW2 work for IPv6?
|
| Or can someone recommend a statefull firewall for IPv6?
You could try ipfilter, it's included in FreeBSD (man ipf). There is a
porting effort to
> Do you have multiple connectivity to two separate metro area
> exchanges, with multiple upstreams at each?
i dont know about europe, but here in the US, finding transits and
filling up fib with 130K+ routes is easier than ever. welcome to equinix
> Most large cities ar
Hello everyone:
On FreeBSD with ipfw/dummynet for traffic shaping, one uses the
pipe with:
ipfw pipe 1 config bw size
to set the size of the pipe. I noticed on Linux, they can set a burst
size so it can burst a x number over the pipe size, is there a similar
setting available? Also, I
James wrote:
> rewriting of routing stack and implementing FIB-like structure as what andre
> proposed in this thread is very welcoming.
Just wait a few month and then have a look at what I put up. :-)
> there are still other things freebsd lacks. such as uRPF that
> _SER
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:14:31PM +0200, Cole wrote:
>
> The problem with freevrrp on vlan is that the ether MAC address gets
> changed on the vlan device which is then different to the parent
> device that the vlan was attached to. Since the vlan then has a
> different ether MAC to the parent de
hello -
> Is there any plans about integration of BGP routing daemon (Zebra or Quagga)
> into FreeBSD? With BGP routing daemon onboard, FreeBSD will be a strong
> alternative against expensive commercial routers. I have successfull experience
> of running FreeBSD STABLE with 2 full BGP v
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 04:36, Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> In message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
>
> lian Elischer wrote:
...
> >The trick is that you need to be able to arbitrarily add a protocol,
> >or a firewall stack or other modules. As I said it can be done.
> >What is a problem is that 'sta
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:40:07AM -0500, Erik Sliman wrote:
[...]
Thank you. That worked. I read all the documentation I could find, which
was very little. Basic networking requirements like this should be in
the FreeBSD Manual. rc.conf man pages gave no examples, and d
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:40:07AM -0500, Erik Sliman wrote:
[...]
> Thank you. That worked. I read all the documentation I could find, which
> was very little. Basic networking requirements like this should be in
> the FreeBSD Manual. rc.conf man pages gave no examples, and differed
> from one
Hi
The problem with freevrrp on vlan is that the ether MAC address gets changed on the
vlan device which is then different to the
parent device that the vlan was attached to. Since the vlan then has a different ether
MAC to the parent device, i dont think the
parent device is passing the packet
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> Hello Erik,
>
> Wednesday, March 3, 2004, 5:17:00 PM, you wrote:
>
> > How do you give a computer multiple static IPs?
>
> > I've tried many things, including the ifaliases setting in rc.conf:
>
> > ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255
> > > # ifconfig rl0 $ip (where ip can be also 192.168.100.1),
> my default
> > > route is deleted, cut off server for my net.
> > >
> >
> > Say you wanted to change from 192.168.100.1/24 to 10.0.0.1/24 With
> > default gateway changed from 192.168.100.254 to 10.0.0.254
>
> ?? My ask is sim
Hey Yar,
I'm sending my reply to a public mailing list mainly to archive it,
but also in a hope to attract some interested developer's attention.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:45:55PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Greetings Ruslan,
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:22:16AM -0800, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
Andre Rein wrote:
[] You've read documentation?
grep alias /etc/defaults/rc.conf
#ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 127.0.0.254 netmask 0x" # Sample alias entry.
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Erik Sliman wrote:
How do you give a computer multiple static IPs?
I've tried many things, including the ifa
[] You've read documentation?
grep alias /etc/defaults/rc.conf
#ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 127.0.0.254 netmask 0x" # Sample alias entry.
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Erik Sliman wrote:
> How do you give a computer multiple static IPs?
>
> I've tried many things, including the ifaliases setting
Hello Erik,
Wednesday, March 3, 2004, 5:17:00 PM, you wrote:
> How do you give a computer multiple static IPs?
> I've tried many things, including the ifaliases setting in rc.conf:
> ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> ifaliases_vr0="192.168.1.36 255.255.255.0"
> bu
How do you give a computer multiple static IPs?
I've tried many things, including the ifaliases setting in rc.conf:
ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifaliases_vr0="192.168.1.36 255.255.255.0"
but none seem to work.
___
[EMAIL
+-le 03/03/2004 14:15 +0100, Pawel Malachowski a dit :
| On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Markus Oestreicher wrote:
|
|> > http://freshmeat.net/projects/freebsd-hut
|> >
|> > i have never used this on a large-scale (i've never considered pre-1.0
|> > software "stable"), but have used it
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Markus Oestreicher wrote:
> > http://freshmeat.net/projects/freebsd-hut
> >
> > i have never used this on a large-scale (i've never considered pre-1.0
> > software "stable"), but have used it many places for failover inside
> > clusters with satisfactory
> [...]
> as for vrrp, there is an opensource/RFC-compliant implementation that
> works on FreeBSD. actually, it was coded specifically for FreeBSD.
>
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/freebsd-hut
>
> i have never used this on a large-scale (i've never considered pre-1.0
> software "stable"), but
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:47:38PM +0100, Joost Bekkers wrote:
> Hello
>
> Are there any plans to make IPFW2 work for IPv6?
i posted some experimental code to the -network (or was it -ipfw ?) list
early in january, expect a cleaned up version in a couple of weeks.
The patch was for -stable but sh
Hello
Are there any plans to make IPFW2 work for IPv6?
Or can someone recommend a statefull firewall for IPv6?
Thanks
--
greetz Joost
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubs
On вт, 2004-03-02 at 19:32 +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:09:02PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > I do not insist that AS pathes in kernel are good idea. If you show me an
> > other way to get AS information when constructing netflow exports in kernel,
> > I'd be than
24 matches
Mail list logo
