Hi,
Bit of a delayed response I'm afraid - PC troubles.
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:28:23AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Tony Frank wrote (in [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 05:21:34PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:19:51PM +0200
On 1 Mar, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> [] move ARP out of the routing table and instantiate it once per ethernet
> broadcast domain. (started)
Applause!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsub
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:16:25PM -0500, James wrote:
> > > [] move IPv4 routing to its own optimized routing table structure and
>
> finally it's about time :)
I've been fielding suggestions from individuals who feel using a multi-bit
trie might be more suitable for achieving higher PP
> > [] move IPv4 routing to its own optimized routing table structure and
finally it's about time :)
> > add multi-path and policy-routing options. (planned)
would the policy-routing optioned table sort of similar to VRF's or
different routing instances that could
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:57:38AM +0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
> From: Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack
> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:07:52 -0800
>
> > On Monday 01 March 2004 14:18, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > [] automatically sizin
From: Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:07:52 -0800
> On Monday 01 March 2004 14:18, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > [] automatically sizing TCP send buffers to achieve optimal performance
> > over a wide range
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:37:41AM +0900, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wes Peters wrote:
> >On Monday 01 March 2004 14:18, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> >>[] establish a testbed for testing and qualification of TCP performance
> >> and optimizations over a wide range of network conditions (types,
Lars Eggert wrote:
this sounds like something you could do with planetlab
(http://planet-lab.org/). Do you have access? (Or maybe I misunderstood
what you meant by "testbed".)
Argh. Yes, it runs Linux. Yes, I'm jet lagged. (But there was some talk
about running something else on planetlab at som
Hi,
Wes Peters wrote:
On Monday 01 March 2004 14:18, Andre Oppermann wrote:
[] establish a testbed for testing and qualification of TCP performance
and optimizations over a wide range of network conditions (types,
speeds, packet loss ratios, out of order, etc). (started)
Be sure to coordin
On Monday 01 March 2004 14:18, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I put this up for coordination and cooperation in my planned work on the
> FreeBSD networking system. This is my todo list of things I want to do
> from now through summer 04. If you are or intend to work on one of these
> please
Hi,
I am wondering why do we need a new PPP node. There are already so many
implementations. If we need a Netgraph PPP support, mpd + ng_ppp seems to be
enough, doesn't it ?
Regards,
Vincent
On Monday 01 March 2004 18:11, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just release new version (1.3) of
Hi all,
I put this up for coordination and cooperation in my planned work on the
FreeBSD networking system. This is my todo list of things I want to do
from now through summer 04. If you are or intend to work on one of these
please step forward so we can coordinate. :-)
[] move ARP out of the
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net NFS root configurations without dynamic
Hi everyone
I've just applied Tanzer's multipath routing patches over FreeBSD 4.8,
compiled the kernel and everything worked fine.
Basically, my idea is to load share default outgoing traffic over 2
redundant routers which are on the same LAN.
I've tried the following:
#test route add def
Hi,
I just release new version (1.3) of ng_sppp, that implements
netgraph sppp node.
This version from now should work on both 4.x and 5.x branches.
I want to commit it to CURRENT, so if you have any
suggestions/objections
please let me know.
Code can be downloaded from:
http://users
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, David Burns wrote:
> The modification was to reduce the NIC interrupt rate via a rudimentary
> hardware polling scheme based on the 3c905x countdown timer.
Well, the number of interrupts per second is really much higher than e.g. with
the fxp driver:
xl driver TX: 13500 in
Hi everyone
I have a some difficalties with installing a bge0 (BCM5701TKHB nic from
3COM) on FreeBSD 4.9
i already chenaged 18000 to 1 in if_bge.c
and patch some files by files from freebsd.org/~wpaul
and download 60M from 3com, but those driver for linux only
at 1000baseTX it can't get carri
17 matches
Mail list logo
