Re: Assymetric results from iperf across gigabit link (long)

2004-02-05 Thread Mike Hunter
On Jan 30, "To [EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > On Jan 30, "To [EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > > Hi, > > [snip] > > I switched the two pieces of hardware, and the photons still prefer going > uphill, so maybe there's a problem with the fiber after all. I'd still > appreciate any hints on what to ask

Re: switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > [Now CC-ing Chuck Cranor -- the en's author] > > => => http://store.yahoo.com/softbuyweb/inpcidslmod3.html > > => =What makes you think we have a driver for this? > > => The en(4) manual page and the description of this produc

Re: switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-05 Thread Mikhail Teterin
[Now CC-ing Chuck Cranor -- the en's author] => => http://store.yahoo.com/softbuyweb/inpcidslmod3.html => =What makes you think we have a driver for this? => The en(4) manual page and the description of this product (on the => page above) as one based on Efficient Network's chi

Re: switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > =On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > => But what about an internal modem? Like > => > =>http://store.yahoo.com/softbuyweb/inpcidslmod3.html > > > =What makes you think we have a driver for this? > > The en(4) manual page and the

Re: switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-05 Thread mi+mx
=On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: => But what about an internal modem? Like => => http://store.yahoo.com/softbuyweb/inpcidslmod3.html =What makes you think we have a driver for this? The en(4) manual page and the description of this product (on the page above) as one based on E

Re: switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello! > > My current network setup consists of the ISP-provided DSL-modem plugged > into the little switch together with the rest of the network. One of the > machines on the runs natd and the others use it as the default router. > > To get better

switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-05 Thread mi+mx
Hello! My current network setup consists of the ISP-provided DSL-modem plugged into the little switch together with the rest of the network. One of the machines on the runs natd and the others use it as the default router. To get better protection I should be using a separate Ethernet card, into

Routing 4 network cards for wirless network

2004-02-05 Thread Sjaak Nabuurs
Wireless USERS Wireless USERS W W W W W W W W W W W W |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-| |-|

Re: Whats the best solution?

2004-02-05 Thread Tuc at the Beach House
> > SSH :-) > Um, yea? > > Have a look at the ssh(1) manpage. > Ok, I have. > > The port forwarding should be able to do > what you are looking for. > But I want EVERY port forwarded. The -L/-R seems to be on a per port basis. > > Also, to get the authentication to be aut

Re: IPFW and NAT - blocking RFC 1918 ("unregistered") network thatmatches my own

2004-02-05 Thread Matt Emmerton
- Original Message - From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:45 PM Subject: IPFW and NAT - blocking RFC 1918 ("unregistered") network thatmatches my own > I am up and running with ipfw 2 and natd, but not all is quite well. > > I can'

IPFW and NAT - blocking RFC 1918 ("unregistered") network that matches my own

2004-02-05 Thread John
I am up and running with ipfw 2 and natd, but not all is quite well. I can't figure out how to block "spoofed" packets from the outside that use the same RFC 1918 network as the one I'm translating to. When I try to put that rule on the exterior interface, it ends up blocking the packets after the

Re: is dev polling support planned for bge ?

2004-02-05 Thread Per Engelbrecht
Hi, Don't know about the bge driver, but if you need special information regarding device polling, you should contact Luigi Rizzo He's 'God' when it comes to tweaking device polling. Also look at; http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/polling/ it gives you some info as well. If your BSD box is a dual ba

Re: 2 isp's, one LAN and need to divide traffic.

2004-02-05 Thread Edwin Culp
Quoting Ryan Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Edwin Culp wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there a, hopefully simple, way to divide bidirectional traffic (LAN/INTERNET)between 2 internet connections more or less as the diagram below. I've just added a DSL connection with a lot more bandwidth than my d

Support for USB Wi-Fi adapters?

2004-02-05 Thread Brett Glass
What is the state of support for USB Wi-Fi adapters in FreeBSD? Several clients have asked me if they can use these adapters on their BSD servers, but so far I can't find one that FreeBSD recognizes. I have one here that's based on the Atmel chipset; it says that it's made by Askey Computers and th

Linux ethernet bonding like driver

2004-02-05 Thread Anshuman Kanwar
Hi all, I have a situation where my servers (Freebsd Solaris and Linux) are connected to two independent switches via 2 seperate NIC cards. To enhance my redundancy I want to group 2 adapters in a active-standby failover mode, with a single IP flipping between the two. Under Solaris I can do thi

is dev polling support planned for bge ?

2004-02-05 Thread Anshuman Kanwar
Hi all, I enabled device polling on the em driver and cut the cpu load from 98%down to 55% ! This machine is a network sniffer doing about 320k packetsper sec (equally distributed over 2 gigE). Great job guys ! Are there any plans for implementing device polling for the bge driver ? Are there an

Re: 2 isp's, one LAN and need to divide traffic.

2004-02-05 Thread Ryan Thompson
Edwin Culp wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Is there a, hopefully simple, way to divide bidirectional traffic > (LAN/INTERNET)between 2 internet connections more or less as the > diagram below. I've just added a DSL connection with a lot more > bandwidth than my ds0. I want to use the ds0 exclusivel

Re: ipsec ipcomp between FreeS/WAN 2.04 and FreeBSD 5.2

2004-02-05 Thread Marco Berizzi
> Hi, > > I tried that before and couldn't get it working :( > Then I asked the Kame peps and it seems that ipcomp > is not supported yet in tunnel mode. That was for > FreeBSD 4.8 and I don't think it has changed since then. I asked help to kame mailing list also. I will forward any relevant in