Merge a NAT-router and a Non-NAT-server

2004-01-31 Thread Jon-Eirik Pettersen
Hi. I'm trying to merge two "servers", one of them is only a NAT-router for the rest of the LAN another one is a host without NAT that needs a unique IP. I have 3 network interfaces on the other. I want that to take over the NAT-routing, but I need to use one network device to that server, and

defect onboard broadcom causing boot hang

2004-01-31 Thread Bjorn Eikeland
I've just changed to using freebsd on my desktop pc, my Asus A7V8X motherboad has a onboard Broadcom chip - this just stopped working under windows and turned into a unknown device. Asus or vendor's support never replied so I just picked up a new fxp card. However under FreeBSD it hangs for a while

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-31 Thread Pavlin Radoslavov
[Note: I am not on the freebsd-net mailing list, so I am answering some of the questions after the thread was brought to my attention] * Regarding existing PIM IPv4 user-level implementations. The only IPv4 PIM implementations for UNIX I am aware of are: a) Commersial: - NextHop (http://w

Will rfc2734 be supported?

2004-01-31 Thread Dario Freni
Hi guys, I was wondering if the standard implementation of IPoFW is planning to be implemented. I'm not expert on device writing, I was also looking for some workarounds, like attach the fwe0:lower netgraph hook to a virtual interface, but reading the rfc I realized that the normal IP packet needs

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-31 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:43:12 -0600, > Bob Van Valzah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP. > I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any > user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that ker