On Jan 30, "Eli Dart" wrote:
> In reply to Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> > I switched the two pieces of hardware, and the photons still prefer going
> > uphill, so maybe there's a problem with the fiber after all. I'd still
> > appreciate any hints on what to ask freebsd to help me figure
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 10:45, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> We don't have pimsd or pimdd for IPv4 in ports at the moment.
> Patches will be gratefully accepted!
I downloaded xorp-0.5 to see if I could pull pimsd from it. A quick
attempt to compile just pim resulted in an error. I did succeed in
compil
In reply to Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> On Jan 30, "To [EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> [snip]
>
> I switched the two pieces of hardware, and the photons still prefer going
> uphill, so maybe there's a problem with the fiber after all. I'd still
> appreciate any hints on what t
On Jan 30, "To [EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> Hi,
[snip]
I switched the two pieces of hardware, and the photons still prefer going
uphill, so maybe there's a problem with the fiber after all. I'd still
appreciate any hints on what to ask freebsd to help me figure it out.
(Yes, we have real fiber t
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:46:06AM -0800, Steve Francis wrote:
...
> No tuning of
>
> kern.polling.each_burst recommended?
on a fast box maybe you can bring it up to 10-15, not clear that
it will give a lot of performance gain, though.
cheers
luigi
>
> >If you are having a lot
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
i would probably increase HZ to 2000 and burst_max to 300-400,
not much more though otherwise you are going to spend too much
time in the timer handler.
In any case, i don't think the card is able to go above 6-700kpps.
OK, thanks.
Each card is only being asked to do (at most
i would probably increase HZ to 2000 and burst_max to 300-400,
not much more though otherwise you are going to spend too much
time in the timer handler.
In any case, i don't think the card is able to go above 6-700kpps.
If you are having a lot of load, it is natural that you are
going to get losse
We have a 4.9-RELEASE-p1 box dedicated to some traffic analysis. It
monitors on two em interfaces: about 200,000 pps on one interface, and
180,000 pps on the other.
It's been dealing with that OK, but our traffic levels are increasing -
we reached over 240,000 pps on one interface last week. T
Hi,
I'm having a confusing time trying to figure out why I can't get good
throughput across a gigabit fiber run. I'm going to provide more details
than is probably necessary to turn this email into something suitable to
read as a bed time story.
It all starts with two IMC media converters, a gig
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Mike Hunter wrote:
> I'm interested in turning off the icmp response limit. In
> /boot/loader.conf I have the following:
/etc/sysctl.conf is what you are looking for. loader.conf is (mostly) for
tunable values which cannot be changed at runtime.
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
__
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:34:41AM -0600, Erik Hamilton wrote:
> I'm currently working on building a simple token ring networking scheme
> over the parallel port (/dev/ppi0) for a graduate project. The project
> itself is to be used later for educational purposes, illustrating how you
> can build a
I've done some local ports before and I know enough about multicast
routing that I stand a chance of being able to come up with some
suitable patches. I even have a good test environment for it here with
Ciscos running PIM.
I probably won't have time to come up with an extensive patch set, but I
Greetings programs,
I'm working on making a freebsd shuttle box to do throughput testing at
remote sites on campus. There's a couple things I'd appreciate some
advice about.
I'm interested in turning off the icmp response limit. In
/boot/loader.conf I have the following:
net.inet.icmp.icmplim=
I'm currently working on building a simple token ring networking scheme
over the parallel port (/dev/ppi0) for a graduate project. The project
itself is to be used later for educational purposes, illustrating how you
can build a network from the ground up through hardware developement,
framing, and
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote:
> I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP.
> I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any
> user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that kernel support
> would be pres
I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP.
I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any
user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that kernel support
would be present with no routing daemon. Am I missing something
obvious?
Th
Hello FreeBSD-net,
I am trying to figure out the best way to link two FreeBSD boxes
together using two seperate internet connections at the same time
per host. Both FreeBSD boxen have both Cable and DSL connections.
I am looking for a way to link them together using both connections.
Cable and DS
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:02:07PM +0100, Lars Eggert wrote:
> does -current support any European USB DSL modems, and if so, which
> ones? I could get this one free with my DSL order:
> http://www.avm.de/de/Produkte/FRITZCard_DSL/FRITZ_Card_DSL_SL_USB/index.js.html
> (Sorry, page is in German.)
18 matches
Mail list logo
