> I'm trying to configure a FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE system to act
> as the default gateway for several virtual lans. I've got
> two NICs in the box, one which supplies the uplink, and one
> which has about 40 vlan(4) vlans on it.
>
> I was trying to run isc-dhcp3's dhcrelay to relay DHCP
> messag
The following patch implements network interface renaming via:
ifconfig name
The mechanism is to change if_xname in the ifp and then to adjust the
link level address sockaddr_dl appropriatly. One question I do have is
if locking the ifa is sufficent or if we need to force the user to down
the
Just some questions about this paper:
"(...) Note that this route has to be at the same level of the tree, i.e.
the code cannot return a less specific match or a more specific
match (...)"
Question: I don't understand why if you are looking for an alternate
route you aren't allowed to retrieve a
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:46:00AM -0500, Will Saxon wrote:
> Are there any plans to support vlan pseudo intefaces with
> a ng_fec or ng_one2many parent? I would like to create some
> sort of failover or aggregation with one of my servers, but
> unfortunately it is using an 802.1Q trunk.
>
I have
Are there any plans to support vlan pseudo intefaces with a ng_fec or ng_one2many
parent? I would like to create some sort of failover or aggregation with one of my
servers, but unfortunately it is using an 802.1Q trunk.
-Will
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mai
> "Jamie" == Jamie Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jamie> The 40GB disk is 7200 RPM, but the others offered on that model
Jamie> are all 5400RPM. I was going to order mine with the 60G disk
Jamie> until my Dell rep. told me that little tidbit.
I chose the storage over speed. Besides 60G
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, David Gilbert wrote:
> > "Mike" == Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mike> Hi everybody, I'm going to be trying to get gigabit throughput
> Mike> between my laptop (Dell Latitude D800 running 5.2-release) and a
> Mike> shuttle box running FreeBSD 5.1 (not in fron
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:41:12PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:09:43PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I need to define LARGE_NAT in ip_nat.h, however there are 3 such files in my
> > system:
> > locate ip_nat.h
> > /usr/include/netinet/ip_nat.h
> > /usr
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:09:43PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I need to define LARGE_NAT in ip_nat.h, however there are 3 such files in my
> system:
> locate ip_nat.h
> /usr/include/netinet/ip_nat.h
> /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter/ip_nat.h
> /usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.h
>
>
Hi,
I need to define LARGE_NAT in ip_nat.h, however there are 3 such files in my
system:
locate ip_nat.h
/usr/include/netinet/ip_nat.h
/usr/src/contrib/ipfilter/ip_nat.h
/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.h
The question is simple - which one should I change?
regards,
Andriy Korud
_
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Randall R. Stewart (home) wrote:
> One of the problems I think that is fundamental to BSD and multi-homing
> is the lack of supports for multiple-default routes. And even in O/S's
there's a patch to FreeBSD 4.8 which adds multipath support at
http://www.dsm.fordham.edu/~tanz
11 matches
Mail list logo