Re: VLAN MTU problem in 4.9 ?

Thanks for all your help regarding this problem... I was able to "fix" my problem (for lack of better word) by doing the following deleting the inet address on xl1 and manually re-adding it. I'm not sure why this fixed my problems, but I can ping my servers behind the router with pings sizes g

ALTQ second beta package for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE

Hi, You can download the package from the FreeBSD/ALTQ project webpage: http://www.rofug.ro/projects/freebsd-altq/ or directly from here: http://www.rofug.ro/projects/freebsd-altq/altq-freebsd-5.2-release-beta2.tar.gz MD5: 7bddb0ff3564cc03c180b5f10286db2e Notes: * Focus is

Re: Dummy Network Interface

My apologies for such an undescriptive post. I am trying to run a kerberos KDC on a mobile system. Unfortunately, the KDC won't bind to the loopback device, and all interfaces are disabled by the operating system when they are inactive - there is no link detected. So I am trying to configure a

Re: kern/61215: off-by-one error likely in ip_fragment()

> "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Ok, I am asking you to check out if it works for you the same Andre> way it works for me. Then we can proceed to the next step and Andre> try to find out why it is different than it used to be for you. Well... I did ask what lin

Re: kern/61215: off-by-one error likely in ip_fragment()

David Gilbert wrote: > > > "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> Where are the outer addresses? > > 24.100.27.151 to 66.246.133.17. As I said... the above was the older > output ... which is the same save printing the tunnel endpoints. > > Andre> It should look

Re: kern/61215: off-by-one error likely in ip_fragment()

> "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Where are the outer addresses? 24.100.27.151 to 66.246.133.17. As I said... the above was the older output ... which is the same save printing the tunnel endpoints. Andre> It should look like this (at least I was able to get co

Re: Dummy Network Interface

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:07:20PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Vlad Galu wrote: > > > |On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > | > > |> How does one create a dummy network interface in FreeBSD? > > | > > |Dummy in what sense? An interface where the packets are

Re: kern/61215: off-by-one error likely in ip_fragment()

David Gilbert wrote: > > > "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I'm not sure what's up. Your patch wouldn't apply to v1.17 of my > >> if_gre.c, so something's wrong with the patch. Regardless, I > >> applied the patch by hand and things didn't work yet. > > Andre>

Re: kern/61215: off-by-one error likely in ip_fragment()

> "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm not sure what's up. Your patch wouldn't apply to v1.17 of my >> if_gre.c, so something's wrong with the patch. Regardless, I >> applied the patch by hand and things didn't work yet. Andre> Didn't it apply because of patch comp

Re: kern/61215: off-by-one error likely in ip_fragment()

David Gilbert wrote: > > > "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> David, the problem with if_gre is actually twofold: > > Andre> - the change of htons(m->m_pkthdr.len) in the last commit to > Andre> that file is incorrect. In FreeBSD this is done in ip_output >

Re: Dummy Network Interface

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Vlad Galu wrote: > |On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | > |> How does one create a dummy network interface in FreeBSD? > | > |Dummy in what sense? An interface where the packets are simply > |dropped? if_tap and if_tun both provide pseudo-device in /dev that a

Re: kern/61215: off-by-one error likely in ip_fragment()

> "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> David, the problem with if_gre is actually twofold: Andre> - the change of htons(m->m_pkthdr.len) in the last commit to Andre> that file is incorrect. In FreeBSD this is done in ip_output Andre> for all packets sent (unless RA

Re: Dummy Network Interface

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Vlad Galu wrote: > Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > |On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | > |> How does one create a dummy network interface in FreeBSD? > | > |Dummy in what sense? An interface where the packets are simply > |dropped? if_tap a

Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance

CHOI Junho wrote: > > I can't read the dump files with ethereal, it says they are corrupt. > > > file *.tcpdump > test-fbsd.tcpdump: tcpdump capture file (little-endian) - version 2.4 (Ethernet, > capture length 120) > test-w2k.tcpdump: tcpdump capture file (little-endian) - version 2.4 (Etherne

Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance

>> > net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack: 0 >> >> It's better to have this turned on. > > Some people or webpage recommends turning off delayed_ack for Windows > clients. Which is true? Our delayed ack implementation used to be slightly broken, but this was fixed around 4.5 or so, and is no longer an issue.

Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance

From: Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:30:23 +0100 > CHOI Junho wrote: > > > > For those who interested, I made packet dump file: > > > > http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~cjh/misc/freebsd-net/ > > > > Best thing is do

Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance

CHOI Junho wrote: > > For those who interested, I made packet dump file: > > http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~cjh/misc/freebsd-net/ > > Best thing is do tcpdump at client machine but I have no admin > permission, so failed. I can't read the dump files with ethereal, it says they are corrupt. But l

Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance

For those who interested, I made packet dump file: http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~cjh/misc/freebsd-net/ Best thing is do tcpdump at client machine but I have no admin permission, so failed. -- CHOI Junho KFUG FreeBSD Project Web Data Bank Key fingerp

Re: Secure MSN and ICQ chat

Hi there, On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:49:58PM -0600, Nicol?s de Bari Embr?z G. R. wrote: > Right now i have an tunnel with IPSEC to another FreeBSD Server the one is > on a secure network and on a different building, what i was thinking to > do, was to install a proxy on the Secure FreeBSD server

Re: Handling 100.000 packets/sec or more

Vlad Galu wrote: > > Adrian Penisoara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > |Hi again, > | > | Thanks for all your answers. > | > | A small comment though. > | > |Vlad Galu wrote: > | > |> Try fxp. It has better polling support, and there's the > |>advantage of > |>the link0 flag. When it's set,

6WIND's DVB-ASI driver

6WIND and ComputerModules provide a DVB-ASI driver for FreeBSD that supports the following boards: - http://www.computermodules.com/broadcast/broadcast-dvb.shtml - DVB Master III Rxâ - DVB Master III Txâ - DVB Master FDâ (I could not test this board) It is provided under the BSD L